BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18214594)

  • 1. Biocompatibility and recanalization characteristics of hydrogel microspheres with polyzene-F as polymer coating.
    Stampfl S; Stampfl U; Bellemann N; Sommer CM; Thierjung H; Radeleff B; Lopez-Benitez R; Berger I; Kauffmann GW; Richter GM
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 18214594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inflammation and recanalization of four different spherical embolization agents in the porcine kidney model.
    Stampfl S; Bellemann N; Stampfl U; Radeleff B; Lopez-Benitez R; Sommer CM; Thierjung H; Berger I; Richter GM
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Apr; 19(4):577-86. PubMed ID: 18375304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Looking for the ideal particle: an experimental embolization study.
    Senturk C; Cakir V; Yorukoglu K; Yilmaz O; Goktay AY
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):336-45. PubMed ID: 19915900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-expanding nitinol renal artery stents: comparison of safety and efficacy of bare versus Polyzene-F nanocoated stents in a porcine model.
    Kurz P; Stampfl U; Christoph P; Henn C; Satzl S; Radeleff B; Berger I; Richter GM
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Feb; 34(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 20976452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental evaluation of early and long-term effects of microparticle embolization in two different mini-pig models. Part I: kidney.
    Stampfl S; Stampfl U; Rehnitz C; Schnabel P; Satzl S; Christoph P; Henn C; Thomas F; Kauffmann GW; Richter GM
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 17216380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Targeting and recanalization after embolization with calibrated resorbable microspheres versus hand-cut gelatin sponge particles in a porcine kidney model.
    Maeda N; Verret V; Moine L; Bédouet L; Louguet S; Servais E; Osuga K; Tomiyama N; Wassef M; Laurent A
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23891049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental liver embolization with four different spherical embolic materials: impact on inflammatory tissue and foreign body reaction.
    Stampfl U; Stampfl S; Bellemann N; Sommer CM; Lopez-Benitez R; Thierjung H; Radeleff B; Berger I; Richter GM
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Mar; 32(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 19139955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Arterial distribution characteristics of Embozene particles and comparison with other spherical embolic agents in the porcine acute embolization model.
    Stampfl S; Bellemann N; Stampfl U; Sommer CM; Thierjung H; Lopez-Benitez R; Radeleff B; Berger I; Richter GM
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1597-607. PubMed ID: 19944985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multimodal visibility of a modified polyzene-F-coated spherical embolic agent for liver embolization: feasibility study in a porcine model.
    Stampfl U; Sommer CM; Bellemann N; Holzschuh M; Kueller A; Bluemmel J; Gehrig T; Shevchenko M; Kenngott H; Kauczor HU; Radeleff B
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1225-31.e2. PubMed ID: 22832143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathologic evaluation of a spherical polyvinyl alcohol embolic agent in a porcine renal model.
    Siskin GP; Dowling K; Virmani R; Jones R; Todd D
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 12525592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gelatin microspheres: correlation between embolic effect/degradability and cross-linkage/particle size.
    Ohta S; Nitta N; Watanabe S; Tomozawa Y; Sonoda A; Otani H; Tsuchiya K; Nitta-Seko A; Yamamoto A; Takahashi M; Murata K
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):1105-11. PubMed ID: 23238849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chitin-based embolic materials in the renal artery of rabbits: pathologic evaluation of an absorbable particulate agent.
    Kwak BK; Shim HJ; Han SM; Park ES
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 15987971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embolic effects of superabsorbent polymer microspheres in rabbit renal model: comparison with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres and polyvinyl alcohol.
    Khankan AA; Osuga K; Hori S; Morii E; Murakami T; Nakamura H
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):384-90. PubMed ID: 15648453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of four different spherical embolic particles in an animal model: a morphologic and histologic evaluation.
    Bilbao JI; de Luis E; García de Jalón JA; de Martino A; Lozano MD; de la Cuesta AM; Sangro B
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1625-38. PubMed ID: 18823795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Water-Based Liquid Embolic: Evaluation of its Safety and Efficacy in a Rabbit Kidney Model.
    Ganguli S; Lareau R; Jarrett T; Soulen MC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2021 Jun; 32(6):813-818. PubMed ID: 33677119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midterm Recanalization after Arterial Embolization Using Hydrogel-Coated Coils versus Fibered Coils in an Animal Model.
    Fohlen A; Namur J; Ghegediban H; Laurent A; Wassef M; Pelage JP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):940-948. PubMed ID: 30174160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of Calibrated Gelatin Sponge Particles in a Rabbit Renal Embolization Model.
    Ye Y; Ren Y; Zeng H; He J; Zhong Z; Wu X
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2019 Aug; 42(8):1183-1191. PubMed ID: 31044293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of endovascular embolization with a collagen-based embolic agent (Marsembol) in an animal model.
    Vidal V; Rolland PH; Daniel L; Moulin G; Bartoli JM; Levrier O
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 20685135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angiographic and histologic comparison of injectable, expansile hydrogel embolic and pushable AZUR embolic devices in porcine arteries.
    Guimaraes M; Uflacker R; Garretson JS; Vestal MC; Jones R; Virmani R; Cruise GM
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1619-1624.e1. PubMed ID: 21945159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Embolization materials made of gelatin: comparison between Gelpart and gelatin microspheres.
    Ohta S; Nitta N; Sonoda A; Seko A; Tanaka T; Takazakura R; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Sakamoto T; Tabata Y; Murata K
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Feb; 33(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17680303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.