These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18215207)

  • 1. Optimal two-stage design for case-control association analysis incorporating genotyping errors.
    Zuo Y; Zou G; Wang J; Zhao H; Liang H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 May; 72(Pt 3):375-87. PubMed ID: 18215207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage designs in case-control association analysis.
    Zuo Y; Zou G; Zhao H
    Genetics; 2006 Jul; 173(3):1747-60. PubMed ID: 16624925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal DNA pooling-based two-stage designs in case-control association studies.
    Zhao Y; Wang S
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 18931509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impacts of errors in individual genotyping and DNA pooling on association studies.
    Zou G; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporation of genetic model parameters for cost-effective designs of genetic association studies using DNA pooling.
    Ji F; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Mendell NR; Gordon D
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Jul; 8():238. PubMed ID: 17634103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal robust two-stage designs for genome-wide association studies.
    Nguyen TT; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 73(Pt 6):638-51. PubMed ID: 19839987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimum two-stage designs in case-control association studies using false discovery rate.
    Kuchiba A; Tanaka NY; Ohashi Y
    J Hum Genet; 2006; 51(12):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 17003959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal two-stage genotyping designs for genome-wide association scans.
    Wang H; Thomas DC; Pe'er I; Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 16607626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of case-controls studies with unscreened controls.
    Moskvina V; Holmans P; Schmidt KM; Craddock N
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 69(Pt 5):566-76. PubMed ID: 16138915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal designs for two-stage genome-wide association studies.
    Skol AD; Scott LJ; Abecasis GR; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 31(7):776-88. PubMed ID: 17549752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of the sources of error in allele frequency estimations from pooled DNA indicates an optimal experimental design.
    Barratt BJ; Payne F; Rance HE; Nutland S; Todd JA; Clayton DG
    Ann Hum Genet; 2002 Nov; 66(Pt 5-6):393-405. PubMed ID: 12485472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How allele frequency and study design affect association test statistics with misrepresentation errors.
    Escott-Price V; Ghodsi M; Schmidt KM
    Biostatistics; 2014 Apr; 15(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 24178186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.
    Tintle N; Gordon D; Van Bruggen D; Finch S
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):370-8. PubMed ID: 19344449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact and quantification of the sources of error in DNA pooling designs.
    Jawaid A; Sham P
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18945289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal selection strategies for QTL mapping using pooled DNA samples.
    Jawaid A; Bader JS; Purcell S; Cherny SS; Sham P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 10(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 11938443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power for genetic association studies with random allele frequencies and genotype distributions.
    Ambrosius WT; Lange EM; Langefeld CD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Apr; 74(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 15024689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The detection of gene-environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?
    Wong MY; Day NE; Luan JA; Chan KP; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 32(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 12690008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA Pooling: a tool for large-scale association studies.
    Sham P; Bader JS; Craig I; O'Donovan M; Owen M
    Nat Rev Genet; 2002 Nov; 3(11):862-71. PubMed ID: 12415316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.