BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18215409)

  • 1. On the inadmissibility of Watterson's estimator.
    Futschik A; Gach F
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Mar; 73(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 18215409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sufficiency of the number of segregating sites in the limit under finite-sites mutation.
    Roychoudhury A; Wakeley J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Sep; 78(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 20573595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of coalescent likelihood estimates: do we need more sites, more sequences, or more loci?
    Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):691-700. PubMed ID: 16364968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robustness of coalescent estimators to between-lineage mutation rate variation.
    Kuhner MK
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Dec; 23(12):2355-60. PubMed ID: 16956973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Asymptotic behavior of the scaled mutation rate estimators.
    Pinheiro HP; Kiihl SF; Pinheiro A; dos Reis SF
    Biom J; 2010 Jun; 52(3):400-16. PubMed ID: 20533409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient estimation of log-normal means with application to pharmacokinetic data.
    Shen H; Brown LD; Zhi H
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):3023-38. PubMed ID: 16345103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimation of population parameters.
    Fu YX; Li WH
    Genetics; 1993 Aug; 134(4):1261-70. PubMed ID: 8375660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval estimation of risk ratio in the simple compliance randomized trial.
    Lui KJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 16820329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts.
    Royle JA
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15032780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating effective population size or mutation rate using the frequencies of mutations of various classes in a sample of DNA sequences.
    Fu YX
    Genetics; 1994 Dec; 138(4):1375-86. PubMed ID: 7896116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of common location parameter of several heterogeneous exponential populations based on generalized order statistics.
    Azhad QJ; Arshad M; Misra AK
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(10):1798-1815. PubMed ID: 35706710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Properties of bias and variance of two multiallelic estimators of F(ST).
    Raufaste N; Bonhomme F
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 May; 57(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 10828220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of the combined response to treatment in multicenter trials.
    Dragalin V; Fedorov V; Jones B; Rockhold F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001 Nov; 11(4):275-95. PubMed ID: 12018780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Empirical Bayes Approach to Shrinkage Estimation on the Manifold of Symmetric Positive-Definite Matrices.
    Yang CH; Doss H; Vemuri BC
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2024; 119(545):259-272. PubMed ID: 38590837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating a weighted average of stratum-specific parameters.
    Brumback BA; Winner LH; Casella G; Ghosh M; Hall A; Zhang J; Chorba L; Duncan P
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4972-91. PubMed ID: 18570275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved estimation of controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding of intermediate variables.
    Kaufman S; Kaufman JS; MacLehose RF; Greenland S; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1683-702. PubMed ID: 15742358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A shrinkage approach to large-scale covariance matrix estimation and implications for functional genomics.
    Schäfer J; Strimmer K
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article32. PubMed ID: 16646851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.