166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18215941)
1. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Wei D; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(5):598-610. PubMed ID: 18215941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction of false positives in lung nodule detection using a two-level neural classification.
Lin JS; Lo SB; Hasegawa A; Freedman MT; Mun SK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 18215903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical textural features for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms.
Kim JK; Park HW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Mar; 18(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10363701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1501-13. PubMed ID: 8531882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image feature selection by a genetic algorithm: application to classification of mass and normal breast tissue.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Wei D; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1671-84. PubMed ID: 8946365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space.
Chan HP; Wei D; Helvie MA; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM; Petrick N
Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):857-76. PubMed ID: 7652012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency.
Polakowski WE; Cournoyer DA; Rogers SK; DeSimio MP; Ruck DW; Hoffmeister JW; Raines RA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):811-9. PubMed ID: 9533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential diagnosis of CT focal liver lesions using texture features, feature selection and ensemble driven classifiers.
Mougiakakou SG; Valavanis IK; Nikita A; Nikita KS
Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 17624744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms.
Banik S; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):279-94. PubMed ID: 20851789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-Class Mammogram Classification Based on Descriptive CNN Features.
Jadoon MM; Zhang Q; Haq IU; Butt S; Jadoon A
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3640901. PubMed ID: 28191461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Urinary bladder segmentation in CT urography using deep-learning convolutional neural network and level sets.
Cha KH; Hadjiiski L; Samala RK; Chan HP; Caoili EM; Cohan RH
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1882. PubMed ID: 27036584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital mammography: mixed feature neural network with spectral entropy decision for detection of microcalcifications.
Zheng B; Qian W; Clarke LP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(5):589-97. PubMed ID: 18215940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of mammographic microcalcifications using gray-level image structure features.
Dhawan AP; Chitre Y; Kaiser-Bonasso C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(3):246-59. PubMed ID: 18215906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography.
Li HD; Kallergi M; Clarke LP; Jain VK; Clark RA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995; 14(3):565-76. PubMed ID: 18215861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Texture analysis for tissue discrimination on T1-weighted MR images of the knee joint in a multicenter study: Transferability of texture features and comparison of feature selection methods and classifiers.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher MJ; Kramer J; Aigner N; Hofmann S; Materka A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 22(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 16215966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images.
Juntu J; Sijbers J; De Backer S; Rajan J; Van Dyck D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):680-9. PubMed ID: 20187212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
