BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18216691)

  • 1. A protocol for cranial base reference in cephalometric studies.
    Alves PV; Mazucheli J; Vogel CJ; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 18216691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cranial base angulation in Brazilian patients seeking orthodontic treatment.
    Alves PV; Mazuchelli J; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):334-8. PubMed ID: 18362708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal jaw base relationship prior to orthognathic surgery: the role of anterior cranial base inclination.
    Jünger TH; Ruf S; Eisfeld J; Howaldt HP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 11307186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability of the inclination of anatomic horizontal reference planes of the craniofacial complex in relation to the true horizontal line in orthognathic patients.
    Zebeib AM; Naini FB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 25432255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
    Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "The pitfalls and merits of using commonly accepted orthodontic cephalometric analyses".
    Murray TM
    J Gen Orthod; 1997 Dec; 8(4):6-17. PubMed ID: 9610305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthognathic surgery in the young cleft patient: preliminary study on subsequent facial growth.
    Wolford LM; Cassano DS; Cottrell DA; El Deeb M; Karras SC; Goncalves JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2524-36. PubMed ID: 19022133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthognathic diagnosis using the proportionate template.
    Jacobson A
    J Oral Surg; 1980 Nov; 38(11):820-33. PubMed ID: 6932495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sella turcica bridges in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients. A retrospective cephalometric study.
    Abdel-Kader HM
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17679532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric evaluation of patients with anterior open-bite.
    Stuani AS; Matsumoto MA; Stuani MB
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11210273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL; Silveira HE
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
    Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Santarelli A; Ciavarella D; Bolouri S; Härle F; Caltabiano M; Lo Muzio L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
    Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Damstra J; Huddleston Slater JJ; Fourie Z; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.