267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18217159)
1. Further validation and simplification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embolism.
Gibson NS; Sohne M; Kruip MJ; Tick LW; Gerdes VE; Bossuyt PM; Wells PS; Buller HR;
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jan; 99(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 18217159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
Douma RA; Gibson NS; Gerdes VE; Büller HR; Wells PS; Perrier A; Le Gal G
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
van Es N; Kraaijpoel N; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Den Exter PL; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Apr; 15(4):678-684. PubMed ID: 28106338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism in older ambulatory adults.
Schouten HJ; Geersing GJ; Oudega R; van Delden JJ; Moons KG; Koek HL
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 Nov; 62(11):2136-41. PubMed ID: 25366538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
van Es J; Beenen LF; Douma RA; den Exter PL; Mos IC; Kaasjager HA; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Middeldorp S; Bossuyt PM
J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Aug; 13(8):1428-35. PubMed ID: 25990714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinically suspected acute recurrent pulmonary embolism: a diagnostic challenge.
Nijkeuter M; Kwakkel-van Erp H; Söhne M; Tick LW; Kruip MJ; Ullmann EF; Kramer MH; Büller HR; Prins MH; Leebeek FW; Huisman MV;
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Jun; 97(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 17549296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.
Douma RA; Mos IC; Erkens PM; Nizet TA; Durian MF; Hovens MM; van Houten AA; Hofstee HM; Klok FA; ten Cate H; Ullmann EF; Büller HR; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV;
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(11):709-18. PubMed ID: 21646554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.
Hendriksen JM; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Geersing GJ
Ann Fam Med; 2016 May; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 27184993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is a normal computed tomography pulmonary angiography safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a likely clinical probability? A patient-level meta-analysis.
van der Hulle T; van Es N; den Exter PL; van Es J; Mos ICM; Douma RA; Kruip MJHA; Hovens MMC; Ten Wolde M; Nijkeuter M; Ten Cate H; Kamphuisen PW; Büller HR; Huisman MV; Klok FA
Thromb Haemost; 2017 Jul; 117(8):1622-1629. PubMed ID: 28569924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.
Wells PS; Anderson DR; Rodger M; Ginsberg JS; Kearon C; Gent M; Turpie AG; Bormanis J; Weitz J; Chamberlain M; Bowie D; Barnes D; Hirsh J
Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis.
Pasha SM; Klok FA; Snoep JD; Mos IC; Goekoop RJ; Rodger MA; Huisman MV
Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e123-7. PubMed ID: 19942258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative diagnoses in patients in whom the GP considered the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
Erkens PM; Lucassen WA; Geersing GJ; van Weert HC; Kuijs-Augustijn M; van Heugten M; Rietjens L; ten Cate H; Prins MH; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Oudega R; Stoffers HE
Fam Pract; 2014 Dec; 31(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 25216665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care.
Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Geersing GJ; Büller HR; Moons KG; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC
J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Jun; 13(6):1004-9. PubMed ID: 25845618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The physician's estimation 'alternative diagnosis is less likely than pulmonary embolism' in the Wells rule is dependent on the presence of other required items.
Klok FA; Zidane M; Djurabi RK; Nijkeuter M; Huisman MV
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jan; 99(1):244-5. PubMed ID: 18217165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study.
Kruip MJ; Slob MJ; Schijen JH; van der Heul C; Büller HR
Arch Intern Med; 2002 Jul; 162(14):1631-5. PubMed ID: 12123408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
van Es J; Mos I; Douma R; Erkens P; Durian M; Nizet T; van Houten A; Hofstee H; ten Cate H; Ullmann E; Büller H; Huisman M; Kamphuisen PW
Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in an emergency department.
Galipienzo J; Garcia de Tena J; Flores J; Alvarez C; Garcia-Avello A; Arribas I
Rom J Intern Med; 2012; 50(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23330286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography.
van Belle A; Büller HR; Huisman MV; Huisman PM; Kaasjager K; Kamphuisen PW; Kramer MH; Kruip MJ; Kwakkel-van Erp JM; Leebeek FW; Nijkeuter M; Prins MH; Sohne M; Tick LW;
JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 16403929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study.
Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Lucassen WA; Büller HR; Cate HT; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Prins MH; Oudega R; van Weert HC; Stoffers HE
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6564. PubMed ID: 23036917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wells Rule and d-Dimer Testing to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis.
van Es N; van der Hulle T; van Es J; den Exter PL; Douma RA; Goekoop RJ; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV; Klok FA; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Aug; 165(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 27182696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
