These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18217818)

  • 1. Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.
    Reddy L; VanRullen R
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?
    Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adults with dyslexia exhibit large effects of crowding, increased dependence on cues, and detrimental effects of distractors in visual search tasks.
    Moores E; Cassim R; Talcott JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Dec; 49(14):3881-90. PubMed ID: 22019772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finding a face in the crowd: parallel and serial neural mechanisms of visual selection.
    Bichot NP; Desimone R
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():147-56. PubMed ID: 17027386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of spacing regularity on visual crowding.
    Saarela TP; Westheimer G; Herzog MH
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):17. PubMed ID: 20884482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter.
    Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration.
    Bricolo E; Gianesini T; Fanini A; Bundesen C; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
    Xu Y
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces.
    Hershler O; Hochstein S
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1707-24. PubMed ID: 15792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance.
    Yeshurun Y; Rashal E
    J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):16. PubMed ID: 20884481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Horizontal and vertical asymmetry in visual spatial crowding effects.
    Feng C; Jiang Y; He S
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(2):13.1-10. PubMed ID: 18217828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.