502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218052)
1. Early bone tissue responses to turned and oxidized implants in the rabbit tibia.
Burgos PM; Rasmusson L; Meirelles L; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 18218052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible.
Salata LA; Burgos PM; Rasmusson L; Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Dahlin C; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 17027235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone.
Ivanoff CJ; Widmark G; Johansson C; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 12814308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation.
Guo Z; Zhou L; Rong M; Zhu A; Geng H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 20209195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased bone contact to a calcium-incorporated oxidized commercially pure titanium implant: an in-vivo study in rabbits.
Fröjd V; Franke-Stenport V; Meirelles L; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 37(6):561-6. PubMed ID: 18346880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants.
Susin C; Qahash M; Hall J; Sennerby L; Wikesjö UM
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 35(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 18269667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrastructure of the interface between titanium and surrounding tissue in rat tibiae--a comparison study on titanium-coated and -uncoated plastic implants.
Okamatsu K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 17535334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The integration of chitosan-coated titanium in bone: an in vivo study in rabbits.
Bumgardner JD; Chesnutt BM; Yuan Y; Yang Y; Appleford M; Oh S; McLaughlin R; Elder SH; Ong JL
Implant Dent; 2007 Mar; 16(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 17356373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An experimental evaluation of a new craniofacial implant using the rabbit tibia model: part I. Histologic findings.
Gottlow J; Sennerby L; Rosengren A; Flynn M
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):832-9. PubMed ID: 20517171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human peri-implant bone response to turned and oxidized titanium implants inserted and retrieved after 2 months.
Shibli JA; Grassi S; de Figueiredo LC; Feres M; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 17846541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants.
Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):782-9. PubMed ID: 19201624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography.
Morinaga K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18384402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants.
Ellingsen JE; Johansson CB; Wennerberg A; Holmén A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 15508981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]