502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218052)
21. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits.
Poulos NM; Rodriguez NA; Lee J; Rueggeberg FA; Schüpbach P; Hall J; Susin C; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):731-8. PubMed ID: 21841981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits.
Rocchietta I; Fontana F; Addis A; Schupbach P; Simion M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 19604281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of hydroxyapatite and titania nanostructures on early in vivo bone response.
Meirelles L; Melin L; Peltola T; Kjellin P; Kangasniemi I; Currie F; Andersson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 18384406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of soft tissue contamination on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits.
Ivanoff CJ; Sennerby L; Lekholm U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Jun; 7(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 9002831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: a rabbit study.
Park KH; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee JB; Kim SH; Lim YJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 34(7):517-27. PubMed ID: 17559620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Regeneration of peri-implant infrabony defects using PerioGlas: a pilot study in rabbits.
Johnson MW; Sullivan SM; Rohrer M; Collier M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):835-9. PubMed ID: 9425765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Vertical bone augmentation using a polytetrafluoroethylene nonporous barrier for osseointegrated implants partially inserted in tibiae of rabbits.
de Macedo NL; do Socorro Ferreira Monteiro A; de Macedo LG
Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):182-91. PubMed ID: 19359869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants.
Lee JE; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Han CH; Lee SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 19885405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Histodynamics of bone tissue formation around immediately loaded cylindrical implants in the rabbit.
Vandamme K; Naert I; Geris L; Sloten JV; Puers R; Duyck J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 17517061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein.
Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Suh JY; Jeung OC; Choi BJ; Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 17298490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
