461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218055)
1. Patients' evaluation of two occlusal schemes for implant overdentures.
Aarts JM; Payne AG; Thomson WM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Sep; 10(3):140-56. PubMed ID: 18218055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.
Thomason JM; Lund JP; Chehade A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 14651229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers.
Roumanas ED; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Kapur KK
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 14714839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sex differences in denture satisfaction.
Pan S; Awad M; Thomason JM; Dufresne E; Kobayashi T; Kimoto S; Wollin SD; Feine JS
J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 18394770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective clinical trial comparing lingualized occlusion to bilateral balanced occlusion in complete dentures: a pilot study.
Kimoto S; Gunji A; Yamakawa A; Ajiro H; Kanno K; Shinomiya M; Kawai Y; Kawara M; Kobayashi K
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 16479769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of mandibular ridge height on patients' perceptions with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures.
Kimoto K; Garrett NR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 16274151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preference.
Esfandiari S; Lund JP; Penrod JR; Savard A; Thomason JM; Feine JS
Gerodontology; 2009 Mar; 26(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 18498362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures - a pragmatic international multicentre study.
Rashid F; Awad MA; Thomason JM; Piovano A; Spielberg GP; Scilingo E; Mojon P; Müller F; Spielberg M; Heydecke G; Stoker G; Wismeijer D; Allen F; Feine JS
J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 20704639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life.
Assunção WG; Zardo GG; Delben JA; Barão VA
Gerodontology; 2007 Dec; 24(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 17999736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different attachment systems: 5-year outcomes.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):696-707. PubMed ID: 21166990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
