These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218462)

  • 1. Optimal experiments in electrical impedance tomography.
    Paulson K; Lionheart W; Pidcock M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1993; 12(4):681-6. PubMed ID: 18218462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography based on genetic algorithm].
    Hou W; Mo Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 12744177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection.
    Adler A; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 18215899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconstruction of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) images based on the expectation maximum (EM) method.
    Wang Q; Wang H; Cui Z; Yang C
    ISA Trans; 2012 Nov; 51(6):808-20. PubMed ID: 22664353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An oppositional biogeography-based optimization technique to reconstruct organ boundaries in the human thorax using electrical impedance tomography.
    Rashid A; Kim BS; Khambampati AK; Kim S; Kim KY
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):767-96. PubMed ID: 21646708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Apr; 45(4):486-93. PubMed ID: 9556965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A hybrid reconstruction method in electrical impedance tomography based on GMRES and Tikhonov regularization].
    Wang H; Fan W; Hu L
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 26(4):701-5. PubMed ID: 19813592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elliptic cylinder geometry for distinguishability analysis in impedance tomography.
    Saka B; Yilmaz A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 14723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
    Adler A; Dai T; Lionheart WR
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S1-11. PubMed ID: 17664627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
    Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
    Frangi AF; Riu PJ; Rosell J; Viergever MA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):566-78. PubMed ID: 12166852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem.
    Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image reconstruction based on L1 regularization and projection methods for electrical impedance tomography.
    Wang Q; Wang H; Zhang R; Wang J; Zheng Y; Cui Z; Yang C
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Oct; 83(10):104707. PubMed ID: 23126790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.