These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218510)

  • 1. Electrical impedance tomography using induced currents.
    Gencer NG; Kuzuoglu M; Ider YZ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1994; 13(2):338-50. PubMed ID: 18218510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental evaluation of two iterative reconstruction methods for induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Ruan W; Guardo R; Adler A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 18215900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing impedance imaging through multimodal tomography.
    Gürsoy D; Mamatjan Y; Adler A; Scharfetter H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3215-24. PubMed ID: 21859594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
    Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of several exciting magnetic fields for induced current EIT.
    Gençer NG; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 1994 May; 15 Suppl 2a():A51-7. PubMed ID: 8087050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical conductivity imaging via contactless measurements.
    Gençer NG; Tek MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jul; 18(7):617-27. PubMed ID: 10504095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design of a microscopic electrical impedance tomography system using two current injections.
    Liu Q; Oh TI; Wi H; Lee EJ; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1505-16. PubMed ID: 21828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
    Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of measurement arrangements for magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography.
    Hao L; Li G; Lin L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Feb; 61(2):444-52. PubMed ID: 24013827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
    Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lorentz force electrical impedance tomography using magnetic field measurements.
    Zengin R; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 61(16):5887-905. PubMed ID: 27436483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
    Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimizing EIT image artefacts from mesh variability in finite element models.
    Adler A; Lionheart WR
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):823-34. PubMed ID: 21646712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast EIT using a new projected image reconstruction method with multi-frequency measurements.
    Lee E; Ts ME; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2012 May; 33(5):751-65. PubMed ID: 22532397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Metherall P; Barber DC; Smallwood RH; Brown BH
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6574):509-12. PubMed ID: 8606768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Paulsen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):829-38. PubMed ID: 15250635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.