These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
41 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218514)
1. Determining cardiac velocity fields and intraventricular pressure distribution from a sequence of ultrafast CT cardiac images. Song SM; Leahy RM; Boyd DP; Brundage BH; Napel S IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1994; 13(2):386-97. PubMed ID: 18218514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analytical phantom for the evaluation of medical flow imaging algorithms. Pashaei A; Fatouraee N Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1791-821. PubMed ID: 19258682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving computation of cardiovascular relative pressure fields from velocity MRI. Ebbers T; Farnebäck G J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 19557846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computation of 3-D velocity fields from 3-D cine CT images of a human heart. Song SM; Leahy RM IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 18222831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regularization of blood motion fields by modified Navier-Stokes equations. Tura A; Sarti A; Gaens T; Lamberti C Med Eng Phys; 1999 Jan; 21(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 10220134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Velocity encoding versus acceleration encoding for pressure gradient estimation in MR haemodynamic studies. Balleux-Buyens F; Jolivet O; Bittoun J; Herment A Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4747-58. PubMed ID: 16985268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simulation of turbulent airflow using a CT based upper airway model of a racehorse. Rakesh V; Datta AK; Ducharme NG; Pease AP J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031011. PubMed ID: 18532860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simulated dye method for flow visualization with a computational model for blood flow. Kim T; Cheer AY; Dwyer HA J Biomech; 2004 Aug; 37(8):1125-36. PubMed ID: 15212917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging]. Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive estimation of 2-D pressure gradients in steady flow using ultrasound. Olesen J; Traberg M; Pihl M; Jensen J IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Aug; 61(8):1409-18. PubMed ID: 25073147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of right and left ventricular volume and ejection fraction using a mathematical cardiac torso phantom. Pretorius PH; Xia W; King MA; Tsui BM; Pan TS; Villegas BJ J Nucl Med; 1997 Oct; 38(10):1528-35. PubMed ID: 9379187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feedback-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle with MRI. Swingen CM; Seethamraju RT; Jerosch-Herold M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 May; 17(5):528-37. PubMed ID: 12720262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic detection of myocardial contours in cine-computed tomographic images. Philip KP; Dove EL; McPherson DD; Gotteiner NL; Vonesh MJ; Stanford W; Reed JE; Rumberger JA; Chandran KB IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1994; 13(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 18218501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tracking myocardial deformation using phase contrast MR velocity fields: a stochastic approach. Meyer FG; Constable RT; Sinusas AJ; Duncan JS IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1996; 15(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 18215927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Numerical Model of Electrokinetic Flow for Capillary Electrophoresis. Hu L; Harrison JD; Masliyah JH J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Jul; 215(2):300-312. PubMed ID: 10419665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency-dependent laminar electroosmotic flow in a closed-end rectangular microchannel. Marcos ; Yang C; Ooi KT; Wong TN; Masliyah JH J Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Jul; 275(2):679-98. PubMed ID: 15178303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A stochastic filtering technique for fluid flow velocity fields tracking. Cuzol A; Mémin E IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Jul; 31(7):1278-93. PubMed ID: 19443925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of transmural, endocardial, and epicardial radial strain and strain rate from phase contrast MR velocity data. Delfino JG; Fornwalt BK; Eisner RL; Leon AR; Oshinski JN J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):522-8. PubMed ID: 18219625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Navier-Stokes-like equations for traffic flow. Velasco RM; Marques W Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Oct; 72(4 Pt 2):046102. PubMed ID: 16383463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations. Raissi M; Yazdani A; Karniadakis GE Science; 2020 Feb; 367(6481):1026-1030. PubMed ID: 32001523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]