145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218556)
1. Comparing different methods of activating the variable stiffness function of a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Jan; 71(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18218556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.
Kaffes AJ; Mishra A; Ding SL; Hope R; Williams SJ; Gillespie PE; Bourke MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Nov; 58(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 14595301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors related to the effectiveness of variable stiffness colonoscope: results of a multivariate analysis.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Vázquez N
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2014 Jan; 106(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 24689711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Othman MO; Bradley AG; Choudhary A; Hoffman RM; Roy PK
Endoscopy; 2009 Jan; 41(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19160154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Sillero C
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jul; 23(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 21593674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Fujii H; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1936-40. PubMed ID: 15447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):711-4. PubMed ID: 12195328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy.
Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gradual stiffness versus magnetic imaging-guided variable stiffness colonoscopes: A randomized noninferiority trial.
Garborg K; Wiig H; Hasund A; Matre J; Holme Ø; Noraberg G; Løberg M; Kalager M; Adami HO; Bretthauer M
United European Gastroenterol J; 2017 Feb; 5(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 28405331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of an electromagnetic colonoscope to assess maneuvers associated with cecal intubation.
Heigh RI; DiBaise JK; Prechel JA; Horn BJ; San Miguel S; Heigh EG; Leighton JA; Edgelow CJ; Fleischer DE
BMC Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 9():24. PubMed ID: 19358723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison on colonoscopic parameters according to length of adult-colonoscope.
Lee SH; Lee DJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 24384429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging.
Shah SG; Brooker JC; Williams CB; Thapar C; Suzuki N; Saunders BP
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Aug; 56(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 12145596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
