179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18218898)
1. Concurrent fast and slow cycling of a transcriptional activator at an endogenous promoter.
Karpova TS; Kim MJ; Spriet C; Nalley K; Stasevich TJ; Kherrouche Z; Heliot L; McNally JG
Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):466-9. PubMed ID: 18218898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physiological characterization of the yeast metallothionein (CUP1) promoter, and consequences of overexpressing its transcriptional activator, ACE1.
Hottiger T; Fürst P; Pohlig G; Heim J
Yeast; 1994 Mar; 10(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 8017099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sin3 is involved in cell size control at Start in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Stephan O; Koch C
FEBS J; 2009 Jul; 276(14):3810-24. PubMed ID: 19523118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Independent recruitment of mediator and SAGA by the activator Met4.
Leroy C; Cormier L; Kuras L
Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Apr; 26(8):3149-63. PubMed ID: 16581789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synergistic activation of transcription by physiologically unrelated transcription factors through cooperative DNA-binding.
Vashee S; Willie J; Kodadek T
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 1998 Jun; 247(2):530-5. PubMed ID: 9642164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromatin repositioning activity and transcription machinery are both recruited by Ace1p in yeast CUP1 activation.
Wimalarathna RN; Pan PY; Shen CH
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2012 Jun; 422(4):658-63. PubMed ID: 22609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The UGA3-GLT1 intergenic region constitutes a promoter whose bidirectional nature is determined by chromatin organization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Ishida C; Aranda C; Valenzuela L; Riego L; Deluna A; Recillas-Targa F; Filetici P; López-Revilla R; González A
Mol Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 59(6):1790-806. PubMed ID: 16553884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variant histone H2A.Z, but not the HMG proteins Nhp6a/b, is essential for the recruitment of Swi/Snf, Mediator, and SAGA to the yeast GAL1 UAS(G).
Lemieux K; Larochelle M; Gaudreau L
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2008 May; 369(4):1103-7. PubMed ID: 18331823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gal11p dosage-compensates transcriptional activator deletions via Taf14p.
Lim MK; Tang V; Le Saux A; Schüller J; Bongards C; Lehming N
J Mol Biol; 2007 Nov; 374(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 17919657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Rpn4p is a positive and negative transcriptional regulator of the ubiquitin-proteasome system].
Karpov DS; Osipov SA; Preobrazhenskaia OV; Karpov VL
Mol Biol (Mosk); 2008; 42(3):518-25. PubMed ID: 18702311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recruitment of mRNA cleavage/polyadenylation machinery by the yeast chromatin protein Sin1p/Spt2p.
Hershkovits G; Bangio H; Cohen R; Katcoff DJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jun; 103(26):9808-13. PubMed ID: 16788068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gcn5p contributes to the bidirectional character of the UGA3-GLT1 yeast promoter.
Aranda C; Colón M; Ishida C; Riego L; Deluna A; Valenzuela L; Herrera J; González A
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2006 Sep; 348(3):989-96. PubMed ID: 16904075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nhp6p and Med3p regulate gene expression by controlling the local subunit composition of RNA polymerase II.
Xue X; Lehming N
J Mol Biol; 2008 May; 379(2):212-30. PubMed ID: 18448120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A genome-wide analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrates the influence of chromatin modifiers on transcription.
Steinfeld I; Shamir R; Kupiec M
Nat Genet; 2007 Mar; 39(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 17325681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms of copper toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae determined by microarray analysis.
Yasokawa D; Murata S; Kitagawa E; Iwahashi Y; Nakagawa R; Hashido T; Iwahashi H
Environ Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 23(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 18528910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A specific transcriptional response of yeast cells to camptothecin dependent on the Swi4 and Mbp1 factors.
Lotito L; Russo A; Bueno S; Chillemi G; Fogli MV; Capranico G
Eur J Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 603(1-3):29-36. PubMed ID: 19094980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation to map cotranscriptional mRNA processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Keogh MC; Buratowski S
Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 257():1-16. PubMed ID: 14769992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Alternative ways of stress regulation in cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: transcriptional activators Msn2 and Msn4].
Erkina TI; Lavrova MV; Erkin AM
Tsitologiia; 2009; 51(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 19435282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcriptional repression of the IMD2 gene mediated by the transcriptional co-activator Sub1.
Koyama H; Sumiya E; Nagata M; Ito T; Sekimizu K
Genes Cells; 2008 Nov; 13(11):1113-26. PubMed ID: 18823333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise can induce bimodality in positive transcriptional feedback loops without bistability.
To TL; Maheshri N
Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5969):1142-5. PubMed ID: 20185727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
