945 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18220786)
1. Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening.
Tropsha A; Golbraikh A
Curr Pharm Des; 2007; 13(34):3494-504. PubMed ID: 18220786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From drug target to leads--sketching a physicochemical pathway for lead molecule design in silico.
Shaikh SA; Jain T; Sandhu G; Latha N; Jayaram B
Curr Pharm Des; 2007; 13(34):3454-70. PubMed ID: 18220783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of AmpC beta-lactamase binders vs. decoys using classification kNN QSAR modeling and application of the QSAR classifier to virtual screening.
Hsieh JH; Wang XS; Teotico D; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2008 Sep; 22(9):593-609. PubMed ID: 18338225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of validated QSAR models of D1 dopaminergic antagonists for database mining.
Oloff S; Mailman RB; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(23):7322-32. PubMed ID: 16279792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QSAR modeling of GPCR ligands: methodologies and examples of applications.
Tropsha A; Wang SX
Ernst Schering Found Symp Proc; 2006; (2):49-73. PubMed ID: 17703577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual high-throughput screening of molecular databases.
Seifert MH; Kraus J; Kramer B
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 17554856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds.
Shen M; Béguin C; Golbraikh A; Stables JP; Kohn H; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 2004 Apr; 47(9):2356-64. PubMed ID: 15084134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation.
Tropsha A
Mol Inform; 2010 Jul; 29(6-7):476-88. PubMed ID: 27463326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On various metrics used for validation of predictive QSAR models with applications in virtual screening and focused library design.
Roy K; Mitra I
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Jul; 14(6):450-74. PubMed ID: 21521150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design.
Mancera RL
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 17554853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Profile-QSAR: a novel meta-QSAR method that combines activities across the kinase family to accurately predict affinity, selectivity, and cellular activity.
Martin E; Mukherjee P; Sullivan D; Jansen J
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1942-56. PubMed ID: 21667971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. QSAR classification model for antibacterial compounds and its use in virtual screening.
Singh N; Chaudhury S; Liu R; AbdulHameed MD; Tawa G; Wallqvist A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2559-69. PubMed ID: 23013546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ligand-based virtual screening and in silico design of new antimalarial compounds using nonstochastic and stochastic total and atom-type quadratic maps.
Marrero-Ponce Y; Iyarreta-Veitía M; Montero-Torres A; Romero-Zaldivar C; Brandt CA; Avila PE; Kirchgatter K; Machado Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1082-100. PubMed ID: 16045304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 4D- quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling: making a comeback.
Fourches D; Ash J
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2019 Dec; 14(12):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 31513441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lead optimization via high-throughput molecular docking.
Joseph-McCarthy D; Baber JC; Feyfant E; Thompson DC; Humblet C
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):264-74. PubMed ID: 17554852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
Brewerton SC
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informatics and modeling challenges in fragment-based drug discovery.
Hubbard RE; Chen I; Davis B
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17554855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring conformational search protocols for ligand-based virtual screening and 3-D QSAR modeling.
Cappel D; Dixon SL; Sherman W; Duan J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Feb; 29(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 25408244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
