345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18221269)
1. Assessing cardiac physical examination skills using simulation technology and real patients: a comparison study.
Hatala R; Issenberg SB; Kassen B; Cole G; Bacchus CM; Scalese RJ
Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 18221269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the relationship between cardiac physical examination technique and accurate bedside diagnosis during an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).
Hatala R; Issenberg SB; Kassen BO; Cole G; Bacchus CM; Scalese RJ
Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S26-9. PubMed ID: 17895683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a cardiac findings checklist for use with simulator-based assessments of cardiac physical examination competence.
Hatala R; Scalese RJ; Cole G; Bacchus M; Kassen B; Issenberg SB
Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19212246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does physical examination competence correlate with bedside diagnostic acumen? An observational study.
Hatala R; Cole G; Kassen BO; Bacchus CM; Issenberg SB
Med Teach; 2007 Mar; 29(2-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 17701633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing bedside cardiologic examination skills using "Harvey," a cardiology patient simulator.
Jones JS; Hunt SJ; Carlson SA; Seamon JP
Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Oct; 4(10):980-5. PubMed ID: 9332631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the gender of the standardised patient influence candidate performance in an objective structured clinical examination?
Humphrey-Murto S; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Smee S
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 19493175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Competency in cardiac examination skills in medical students, trainees, physicians, and faculty: a multicenter study.
Vukanovic-Criley JM; Criley S; Warde CM; Boker JR; Guevara-Matheus L; Churchill WH; Nelson WP; Criley JM
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 166(6):610-6. PubMed ID: 16567598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative effectiveness of high- versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds.
de Giovanni D; Roberts T; Norman G
Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 43(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 19573189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of consultation skills assessments using standardised versus real patients.
Reinders ME; Blankenstein AH; van Marwijk HW; Knol DL; Ram P; van der Horst HE; de Vet HC; van der Vleuten CP
Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 21564197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring the use of videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students.
Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Lewis M; Coady D; Morley C; Kay L; Walker D; Hassell AB
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Jun; 57(5):869-76. PubMed ID: 17530689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating simulation-based objective structured clinical examination into the Israeli National Board Examination in Anesthesiology.
Berkenstadt H; Ziv A; Gafni N; Sidi A
Anesth Analg; 2006 Mar; 102(3):853-8. PubMed ID: 16492840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of patient management skills and clinical skills of practising doctors using computer-based case simulations and standardised patients.
Hawkins R; MacKrell Gaglione M; LaDuca T; Leung C; Sample L; Gliva-McConvey G; Liston W; De Champlain A; Ciccone A
Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):958-68. PubMed ID: 15327677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulated and standardized patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003.
Adamo G
Med Teach; 2003 May; 25(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 12881047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using children as standardised patients for assessing clinical competence in paediatrics.
Tsai TC
Arch Dis Child; 2004 Dec; 89(12):1117-20. PubMed ID: 15557044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design and validation of 2 objective structured clinical examination stations to assess core undergraduate examination skills of the hand and knee.
Raj N; Badcock LJ; Brown GA; Deighton CM; O'Reilly SC
J Rheumatol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):421-4. PubMed ID: 17304661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Ventriloscope® as an innovative tool for assessing clinical examination skills: appraisal of a novel method of simulating auscultatory findings.
Verma A; Bhatt H; Booton P; Kneebone R
Med Teach; 2011; 33(7):e388-96. PubMed ID: 21696273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a comprehensive examination to assess multiple competencies in surgical residents: does the oral examination still have a role?
Sidhu RS; McIlroy JH; Regehr G
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Nov; 201(5):754-8. PubMed ID: 16256920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Large-scale use of an objective, structured clinical examination for licensing family physicians.
Grand'Maison P; Lescop J; Rainsberry P; Brailovsky CA
CMAJ; 1992 May; 146(10):1735-40. PubMed ID: 1596809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
