BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18221380)

  • 1. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hollis B; Fierst JL; Houle D
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19154371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.
    Whitlock MC; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):569-82. PubMed ID: 19154364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mating behavior in mutant strains of Drosophila melanogaster at different population densities].
    Volkova NE; Sheremet OIu; Vorobieva LI
    Genetika; 2006 Apr; 42(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 16756068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Priest NK; Galloway LF; Roach DA
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 18171147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variation in the strength and softness of selection on deleterious mutations.
    Laffafian A; King JD; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3232-41. PubMed ID: 20662923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2013 Apr; 67(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 23550766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis.
    Artieri CG; Haerty W; Gupta BP; Singh RS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of pathogens on selection against deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Young JA; Yourth CP; Agrawal AF
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Oct; 22(10):2125-9. PubMed ID: 19694894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Connallon T; Knowles LL
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the extent of genome-wide intralocus sexual conflict via experimentally enforced gender-limited selection.
    Morrow EH; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):1046-54. PubMed ID: 18462311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior.
    Head ML; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18067568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution: good males are bad females.
    Price TA; Hosken DJ
    Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(5):R168-70. PubMed ID: 17339015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival.
    Brooks R
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6791):67-70. PubMed ID: 10894542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.
    Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 15842486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.
    Agrawal AF
    Nature; 2001 Jun; 411(6838):692-5. PubMed ID: 11395771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection.
    Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF
    Ecol Lett; 2008 May; 11(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 18279355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.