These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1822211)

  • 1. Calibration and validation of linearity in chromatographic biopharmaceutical analysis.
    Karnes HT; March C
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1991; 9(10-12):911-8. PubMed ID: 1822211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new approach to evaluate regression models during validation of bioanalytical assays.
    Singtoroj T; Tarning J; Annerberg A; Ashton M; Bergqvist Y; White NJ; Lindegardh N; Day NP
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2006 Apr; 41(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 16332425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Azithromycin assay in drug formulations: Validation of a HPTLC method with a quadratic polynomial calibration model using the accuracy profile approach.
    Bouklouze A; Kharbach M; Cherrah Y; Vander Heyden Y
    Ann Pharm Fr; 2017 Mar; 75(2):112-120. PubMed ID: 27692351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of linear and non-linear equations for univariate calibration.
    Kirkup L; Mulholland M
    J Chromatogr A; 2004 Mar; 1029(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 15032343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some practical considerations for linearity assessment of calibration curves as function of concentration levels according to the fitness-for-purpose approach.
    Jurado JM; Alcázar A; Muñiz-Valencia R; Ceballos-Magaña SG; Raposo F
    Talanta; 2017 Sep; 172():221-229. PubMed ID: 28602298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advances in validation, risk and uncertainty assessment of bioanalytical methods.
    Rozet E; Marini RD; Ziemons E; Boulanger B; Hubert P
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2011 Jun; 55(4):848-58. PubMed ID: 21237607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and application of a calibration regression routine in conjunction with linear and non-linear chromatographic detector responses.
    Burrows JL; Watson KV
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1994 Apr; 12(4):523-31. PubMed ID: 7918769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of bioanalytical chromatographic methods.
    Hartmann C; Smeyers-Verbeke J; Massart DL; McDowall RD
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1998 Jun; 17(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 9638572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isotopic analogues as internal standards for quantitative analyses of drugs and metabolites by GC-MS--nonlinear calibration approaches.
    Whiting TC; Liu RH; Chang WT; Bodapati MR
    J Anal Toxicol; 2001 Apr; 25(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 11327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two-concentration with multi-concentration linear regressions: Retrospective data analysis of multiple regulated LC-MS bioanalytical projects.
    Musuku A; Tan A; Awaiye K; Trabelsi F
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2013 Sep; 934():117-23. PubMed ID: 23917407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial evaluation of quantitative performance of chromatographic methods using replicates at multiple concentrations.
    Castillo MA; Castells RC
    J Chromatogr A; 2001 Jul; 921(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 11471796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective validation of chromatographic analytical methods: The illustrative case of androgenic steroids.
    Alladio E; Amante E; Bozzolino C; Seganti F; Salomone A; Vincenti M; Desharnais B
    Talanta; 2020 Aug; 215():120867. PubMed ID: 32312473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of an improved procedure for testing the linearity of analytical methods to pharmaceutical analysis.
    Mark H
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2003 Sep; 33(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 12946526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linearity and the limitations of least squares calibration.
    Mulholland M; Hibbert DB
    J Chromatogr A; 1997 Feb; 762(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 9098967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Key elements of bioanalytical method validation for small molecules.
    Bansal S; DeStefano A
    AAPS J; 2007 Mar; 9(1):E109-14. PubMed ID: 17408234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of calibration routines in pharmaceutical and bioanalytical separations, with reference to Monte Carlo simulations.
    Burrows JL
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1993 Jul; 11(7):523-31. PubMed ID: 8399525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linear regression analysis and its application to multivariate chromatographic calibration for the quantitative analysis of two-component mixtures.
    Dinç E; Ozdemir A
    Farmaco; 2005; 60(6-7):591-7. PubMed ID: 15922340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of stability-indicating HPTLC method for quantitative determination of metadoxine in pharmaceutical dosage form.
    Kaul N; Agrawal H; Patil B; Kakad A; Dhaneshwar SR
    Farmaco; 2005 Apr; 60(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 15848212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choosing the calibration model in assay validation.
    Nagaraja NV; Paliwal JK; Gupta RC
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1999 Jul; 20(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 10701959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty of pesticide residue concentration determined from ordinary and weighted linear regression curve.
    Yolci Omeroglu P; Ambrus Á; Boyacioglu D
    Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1324-1339. PubMed ID: 29521572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.