These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18222858)

  • 1. Limitations of the lead oxide vidicon for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Van Lysel MS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 18222858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CCD camera for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Ersahin A; Qian YJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995; 14(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 18215878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of beam parameters for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 8177154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy subtraction angiography is comparable to digital subtraction angiography in terms of iodine Rose SNR.
    Burton CS; Mayo JR; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5925. PubMed ID: 27806612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    McCollough CH; Van Lysel MS; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 2586373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Measurement of image-producing properties of DSA equipment].
    Busch HP; Strauss LG; Freimarck RD
    Rofo; 1984 Jul; 141(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 6431530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital subtraction angiography: principles and pitfalls of image improvement techniques.
    Levin DC; Schapiro RM; Boxt LM; Dunham L; Harrington DP; Ergun DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Sep; 143(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 6380244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy-resolved computed tomography: first experimental results.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5595-613. PubMed ID: 18799830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Equipment and methodologic parameters of radiation exposure in digital subtraction angiography].
    Neufang KF; Ewen K
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 Apr; 42(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 2652271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-Spatial-Resolution Medical-Imaging System Using a HARPICON Camera Coupled with a Fluorescent Screen.
    Umetani K; Ueki H; Ueda K; Hirai T; Takeda T; Doi T; Wu J; Itai Y; Akisada M
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 1996 May; 3(Pt 3):136-44. PubMed ID: 16702671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital subtraction angiography: a comparison of 512(2) and 1024(2) imaging.
    Gomes AS; Papin PJ; Mankovich NJ; Lois JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Apr; 146(4):835-8. PubMed ID: 3513493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: a feasibility study.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1475-95. PubMed ID: 18296774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [An experience of the clinical study with angiography system using a Flat Panel Detector].
    Okusako K; Shogaki M; Yokoyama K; Ogawa T; Tanaka K; Ichida T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Okuyama K; Kudoh H; Tanaka S; Nakamura K; Ikeda S; Suzuki K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 12766271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arterial imaging in patients with lower extremity ischemia and diabetes mellitus.
    Pomposelli F
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):81S-91S. PubMed ID: 20804938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beam attenuation devices for digital subtraction angiography.
    Kelly WM; Brant-Zawadzki M; Norman D; Gould R
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):817-8. PubMed ID: 6387799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
    U-King-Im JM; Trivedi R; Cross J; Higgins N; Graves M; Kirkpatrick P; Antoun N; Gillard JH
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of performance characteristics of different DSA-installations.
    Busch HP; Strauss LG
    Eur J Radiol; 1987 Feb; 7(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 3549311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.