These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18222858)
1. Limitations of the lead oxide vidicon for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Van Lysel MS IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 18222858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CCD camera for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Molloi S; Ersahin A; Qian YJ IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995; 14(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 18215878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of beam parameters for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Van Lysel MS Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 8177154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Energy subtraction angiography is comparable to digital subtraction angiography in terms of iodine Rose SNR. Burton CS; Mayo JR; Cunningham IA Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5925. PubMed ID: 27806612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. McCollough CH; Van Lysel MS; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 2586373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Equipment and methodologic parameters of radiation exposure in digital subtraction angiography]. Neufang KF; Ewen K Rontgenblatter; 1989 Apr; 42(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 2652271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-Spatial-Resolution Medical-Imaging System Using a HARPICON Camera Coupled with a Fluorescent Screen. Umetani K; Ueki H; Ueda K; Hirai T; Takeda T; Doi T; Wu J; Itai Y; Akisada M J Synchrotron Radiat; 1996 May; 3(Pt 3):136-44. PubMed ID: 16702671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital subtraction angiography: a comparison of 512(2) and 1024(2) imaging. Gomes AS; Papin PJ; Mankovich NJ; Lois JF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Apr; 146(4):835-8. PubMed ID: 3513493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: a feasibility study. Shikhaliev PM Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1475-95. PubMed ID: 18296774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An experience of the clinical study with angiography system using a Flat Panel Detector]. Okusako K; Shogaki M; Yokoyama K; Ogawa T; Tanaka K; Ichida T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Okuyama K; Kudoh H; Tanaka S; Nakamura K; Ikeda S; Suzuki K Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 12766271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Arterial imaging in patients with lower extremity ischemia and diabetes mellitus. Pomposelli F J Vasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 52(3 Suppl):81S-91S. PubMed ID: 20804938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beam attenuation devices for digital subtraction angiography. Kelly WM; Brant-Zawadzki M; Norman D; Gould R Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):817-8. PubMed ID: 6387799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences. U-King-Im JM; Trivedi R; Cross J; Higgins N; Graves M; Kirkpatrick P; Antoun N; Gillard JH Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of performance characteristics of different DSA-installations. Busch HP; Strauss LG Eur J Radiol; 1987 Feb; 7(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 3549311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]