These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18222891)

  • 1. Objective analysis of ultrasound images by use of a computational observer.
    Lopez H; Loew MH; Goodenough DJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1992; 11(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 18222891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphometry of dermal collagen orientation by Fourier analysis is superior to multi-observer assessment.
    van Zuijlen PP; de Vries HJ; Lamme EN; Coppens JE; van Marle J; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E
    J Pathol; 2002 Nov; 198(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 12375260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method of clustering observers with different visual characteristics.
    Niimi T; Imai K; Ikeda M; Maeda H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 57(1):158-61. PubMed ID: 15975754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of temporally filtered X-ray fluoroscopy images.
    Wilson DL; Jabri KN; Aufrichtig R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jan; 18(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 10193694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal shifted estimates of human-observer templates in two-alternative forced-choice experiments.
    Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 12071614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
    Burgess AE
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of contrast-detail analysis for ultrasound images.
    Lopez H; Loew MH; Butler PF; Hill MC; Allman RM
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2407935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model observers for Low Contrast Detectability evaluation in dynamic angiography: A feasible approach.
    Villa R; Paruccini N; Baglivi A; Signoriello M; Montezuma Velasquez RA; Morzenti S; De Ponti E; Crespi A
    Phys Med; 2019 Aug; 64():89-97. PubMed ID: 31515040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency of low-contrast detail detectability in fluoroscopic imaging.
    Tapiovaara MJ
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 9167156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observer variability when evaluating patient movement from electronic portal images of pelvic radiotherapy fields.
    Lewis DG; Ryan KR; Smith CW
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Mar; 74(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15763308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wavelet based noise reduction in CT-images using correlation analysis.
    Borsdorf A; Raupach R; Flohr T; Hornegger J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1685-703. PubMed ID: 19033085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-view 3D echocardiography compounding based on feature consistency.
    Yao C; Simpson JM; Schaeffter T; Penney GP
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):6109-28. PubMed ID: 21873770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using human and model performance to compare MRI reconstructions.
    Tisdall MD; Atkins MS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Nov; 25(11):1510-7. PubMed ID: 17117780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small nodule detectability evaluation using a generalized scan-statistic model.
    Popescu LM; Lewitt RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6225-44. PubMed ID: 17110782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.
    Monnin P; Marshall NW; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4221-38. PubMed ID: 21701050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency decomposition and compounding of ultrasound medical images with wavelet packets.
    Cincotti G; Loi G; Pappalardo M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):764-71. PubMed ID: 11513027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of automated and human observer lesion detecting ability using phantoms.
    Kofler JM; Lindstrom MJ; Kelcz F; Madsen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15749558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
    Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
    Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detectability in nuclear medicine images by a random-dot model: a theoretical analysis.
    Yamada I; Tanaka K
    Appl Opt; 1994 May; 33(14):2900-8. PubMed ID: 20885651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.