BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18223446)

  • 1. Abnormal timing delays in auditory brainstem responses evoked by bilateral cochlear implant use in children.
    Gordon KA; Valero J; van Hoesel R; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 18223446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use.
    Gordon KA; Valero J; Papsin BC
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 17850999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural processing in children using bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Valero J; Papsin BC
    Neuroreport; 2007 Apr; 18(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 17413667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the optimal timing for bilateral cochlear implantation in children?
    Gordon KA; Jiwani S; Papsin BC
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S8-14. PubMed ID: 21917210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory neuropathy: an update.
    Gibson WP; Sanli H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):102S-106S. PubMed ID: 17496659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations.
    Kim AH; Kileny PR; Arts HA; El-Kashlan HK; Telian SA; Zwolan TA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):626-34. PubMed ID: 18520627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Sparreboom M; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1055-61. PubMed ID: 20418793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central auditory development in children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Bauer PW; Sharma A; Martin K; Dorman M
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 132(10):1133-6. PubMed ID: 17043265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal.
    Song MH; Bae MR; Kim HN; Lee WS; Yang WS; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Aug; 120(8):1625-31. PubMed ID: 20564653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.