274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18223446)
41. Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():148-56. PubMed ID: 26302945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants.
Kileny PR; Zwolan TA; Boerst A; Telian SA
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S90-2. PubMed ID: 9391613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in Digisonic cochlear implant users.
Maurer J; Collet L; Pelster H; Truy E; Gallégo S
Laryngoscope; 2002 Dec; 112(12):2220-4. PubMed ID: 12461344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Electrophysiologic and other objective tests in pediatric cochlear implantation].
Bordure P; O'Donoghue GM; Mason S
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1996; 113(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 9033678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Relationships between bilateral auditory brainstem activity and inter-implant interval in children with cochlear implants.
Wu YL; Chen L; Zhu HY; Luo WY; Shi K; Hou XY; Sun JW; Sun JQ; Guo XT
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Apr; 281(4):1735-1743. PubMed ID: 37924365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Impact of modulating phase duration on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses obtained during cochlear implantation.
Bonne NX; Douchement D; Hosana G; Desruelles J; Fayoux P; Ruzza I; Vincent C
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 25167217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB; Gibson WP; Sanli H
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of cochlear nuclei during central auditive implant setting].
Alegre M; Iriarte J; Manrique M; Huarte A; Vanaclocha V; Artieda J
Rev Neurol; 1999 Aug 1-15; 29(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 10797901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Value of auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in patients with a Digisonic cochlear implant].
Truy E; Gallego S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Berger-Vachon C; Morgon A
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1997; 114(4):116-24. PubMed ID: 9686020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of unilateral cochlear implant use on contralateral electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses to round window membrane electrical stimulation.
Zhang JG; Chen L; Li P; Sun JW; Guo XT; Sun JQ
Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Jun; 141(6):588-593. PubMed ID: 33823755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effects of asymmetric hearing on bilateral brainstem function: findings in children with bimodal (electric and acoustic) hearing.
Polonenko MJ; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20 Suppl 1():13-20. PubMed ID: 25998954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Clinical application of the multichannel auditory brainstem implant].
Wu H; Sterkers O; Rey A; Bouccara D
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Apr; 35(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 12768669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Electric auditory brain stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants.
Nikolopoulos TP; Mason SM; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S120-1. PubMed ID: 9391627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Balancing current levels in children with bilateral cochlear implants using electrophysiological and behavioral measures.
Gordon KA; Abbasalipour P; Papsin BC
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():193-206. PubMed ID: 27021590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The effect of device use after sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children: An electrophysiological approach.
Sparreboom M; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 86():161-6. PubMed ID: 27260600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Interaural delay-dependent changes in the binaural interaction component of the guinea pig brainstem responses.
Goksoy C; Demirtas S; Yagcioglu S; Ungan P
Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 1054(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 16054603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
