These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18223447)
41. Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels. Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA; Gantz BJ Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Jun; 115(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 16805373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study. Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. 1-year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy. Riss D; Arnoldner C; Reiss S; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 129(9):988-91. PubMed ID: 19052929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps. Buechner A; Frohne-Büchner C; Gaertner L; Stoever T; Battmer RD; Lenarz T Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 19479460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants. Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience. Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants. Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study. Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of low-frequency hearing. Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cochlear implant channel separation and its influence on speech perception--implications for a new electrode design. Arnoldner C; Riss D; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 17536200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Multicentre evaluation of music perception in adult users of Advanced Bionics cochlear implants. Adams D; Ajimsha KM; Barberá MT; Gazibegovic D; Gisbert J; Gómez J; Raveh E; Rocca C; Romanet P; Seebens Y; Zarowski A Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24074504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Short-term study of the effect of speech coding strategy on the auditory performance of pre- and post-lingually deafened adults implanted with the Clarion CII. Filipo R; Mancini P; Ballantyne D; Bosco E; D'Elia C Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 15224855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. HiRes with Fidelity 120 benefit in native speakers of Korean. Park HJ; Lee SC; Chun YM; Lee JY Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():85-8. PubMed ID: 19127561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Localization by postlingually deafened adults fitted with a single cochlear implant. Grantham DW; Ricketts TA; Ashmead DH; Labadie RF; Haynes DS Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 17975505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today. Krueger B; Joseph G; Rost U; Strauss-Schier A; Lenarz T; Buechner A Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 18520586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies. Brockmeier SJ; Grasmeder M; Passow S; Mawmann D; Vischer M; Jappel A; Baumgartner W; Stark T; Müller J; Brill S; Steffens T; Strutz J; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Arnold W Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):49S-51S. PubMed ID: 17496646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Tone perception results with Harmony and HiRes 120 in Cantonese-speaking subjects. Lee KY; Luk BP; Wong TK; Tong MC; Van Hasselt CA Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():68-73. PubMed ID: 19156707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]