120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18223448)
1. Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.
Buechner A; Brendel M; Krüeger B; Frohne-Büchner C; Nogueira W; Edler B; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 18223448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results from a psychoacoustic model-based strategy for the nucleus-24 and freedom cochlear implants.
Büchner A; Nogueira W; Edler B; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 18223445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementation of perceptual channels in children implanted with a HiRes 90K device.
Mancini P; Bosco E; D'agosta L; Traisci G; Nicastri M; Capelli G; Ballantyne D; Filipo R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 129(12):1442-50. PubMed ID: 19922095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.
Donaldson GS; Dawson PK; Borden LZ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 21084987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoring speech perception with cochlear implants by spanning defective electrode contacts.
Frijns JH; Snel-Bongers J; Vellinga D; Schrage E; Vanpoucke FJ; Briaire JJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 133(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 23294241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps.
Buechner A; Frohne-Büchner C; Gaertner L; Stoever T; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 19479460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of speech perception performance between Sprint/Esprit 3G and Freedom processors in children implanted with nucleus cochlear implants.
Santarelli R; Magnavita V; De Filippi R; Ventura L; Genovese E; Arslan E
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 19225440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.
Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of the HiRes 120 coding strategy combined with the Harmony processor in an adult European multicentre study.
Büchner A; Lenarz T; Boermans PP; Frijns JH; Mancini P; Filipo R; Fielden C; Cooper H; Eklöf M; Freijd A; Lombaard S; Meerton L; Pickerill M; Vanat Z; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Kienast B; Boyle P; Arnold L; Meyer B; Sterkers O; Müller-Deile J; Ambrosch P; Helbig S; Frachet B; Gallego S; Truy E; Jeffs E; Morant A; Marco J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 132(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 22074015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
