These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18223448)
21. Everyday listening questionnaire: correlation between subjective hearing and objective performance. Brendel M; Frohne-Buechner C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Buechner A Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 23998527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study. Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new fine structure speech coding strategy: speech perception at a reduced number of channels. Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Hamzavi JS Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 18667945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients. Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigation of pitch discrimination and the effect of learning for virtual channels realized by current steering. Brendel M; Frohne-Buechner C; Stoever T; Lenarz T; Buechner A Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 129(12):1425-33. PubMed ID: 19922093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of widening electrode separation on current steering performance. Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 21063206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users. Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Take-Home Trial Comparing Fast Fourier Transformation-Based and Filter Bank-Based Cochlear Implant Speech Coding Strategies. de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():7915042. PubMed ID: 29057265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of low-frequency hearing. Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of a paired or sequential stimulation paradigm with advanced bionics' high-resolution mode. Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Stoever T; Gaertner L; Battmer RD; Lenarz T Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):941-7. PubMed ID: 16151341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations. Berenstein CK; Mens LH; Mulder JJ; Vanpoucke FJ Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 18595189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants. Gordon KA; Papsin BC Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Firszt JB; Koch DB; Downing M; Litvak L Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 17667771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Continuous improvement in Mandarin lexical tone perception as the number of channels increased: a simulation study of cochlear implant. Lin YS; Lee FP; Huang IS; Peng SC Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 May; 127(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 17453477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation. Lee JC; Yoo MH; Ahn JH; Lee KS Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. SPAN: improved current steering on the advanced bionics CII and HiRes90K system. Saoji A; Litvak L; Boyle P Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():465-8. PubMed ID: 21756674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Acoustic model investigation of a multiple carrier frequency algorithm for encoding fine frequency structure: implications for cochlear implants. Throckmorton CS; Selin Kucukoglu M; Remus JJ; Collins LM Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):30-42. PubMed ID: 16797896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. New cochlear implant research coding strategy based on the MP3(000™) strategy to reintroduce the virtual channel effect. Neben N; Lenarz T; Schuessler M; Harpel T; Buechner A Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 May; 133(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 23216089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]