These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18223448)

  • 41. [Study on the effect of spectral details encoding in speech processing on Mandarin recognition for cochlear implants users with speech maskers].
    Guan T; Xu T; Ye D
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 25(2):435-8. PubMed ID: 18610637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Skinner MW
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 19106769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Audiologic outcomes with the penetrating electrode auditory brainstem implant.
    Otto SR; Shannon RV; Wilkinson EP; Hitselberger WE; McCreery DB; Moore JK; Brackmann DE
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1147-54. PubMed ID: 18931643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants.
    Dawson PW; Vandali AE; Knight MR; Heasman JM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 17496668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of converting bilateral cochlear implant subjects to a strategy with increased rate and number of channels.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA; Gantz BJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2006 Jun; 115(6):425-32. PubMed ID: 16805373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Is there a right cochlear implant advantage?
    Henkin Y; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Migirov L; Kronenberg J; Kishon-Rabin L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 18401283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.
    Milczynski M; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19354401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of cochlear implant technology in sequentially bilaterally implanted adults.
    Budenz CL; Roland JT; Babb J; Baxter P; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 19638940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of cochlear implant electrode deactivation on speech perception and in predicting device failure.
    Zeitler DM; Lalwani AK; Roland JT; Habib MG; Gudis D; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18833018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. 1-year results using the Opus speech processor with the fine structure speech coding strategy.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Reiss S; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 129(9):988-91. PubMed ID: 19052929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. HiRes with Fidelity 120 benefit in native speakers of Korean.
    Park HJ; Lee SC; Chun YM; Lee JY
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():85-8. PubMed ID: 19127561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Newman CW; Sandridge SA; Wodzisz LM
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19034196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities.
    Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Vanpoucke FJ; Bongers JS; Briaire JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 129(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 19117170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC; Sucher C; Briggs RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Frequency discrimination with sequential or simultaneous stimulation in MED-EL cochlear implants.
    Nobbe A; Schleich P; Zierhofer C; Nopp P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17851932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.