These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18223448)

  • 61. Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology.
    Iwaki T; Blamey P; Kubo T
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):311-8. PubMed ID: 18569103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Performance groups in adult cochlear implant users: speech perception results from 1984 until today.
    Krueger B; Joseph G; Rost U; Strauss-Schier A; Lenarz T; Buechner A
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 18520586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Evaluation of Advanced Bionics high resolution mode.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Gaertner L; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jul; 45(7):407-16. PubMed ID: 16938799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Better speech recognition in noise with the fine structure processing coding strategy.
    Vermeire K; Punte AK; Van de Heyning P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2010; 72(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 20847579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Impact of early cochlear implantation on the linguistic development of the deaf child.
    Artières F; Vieu A; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):736-42. PubMed ID: 19638938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects.
    Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Music perception in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of findings between HiRes90 and HiRes120.
    Filipo R; Ballantyne D; Mancini P; D'elia C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 18368569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
    Lenarz T; Stöver T; Buechner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Patrick J; Pesch J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. An improved speech processing strategy for cochlear implants based on an active nonlinear filterbank model of the biological cochlea.
    Kim KH; Choi SJ; Kim JH; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):828-36. PubMed ID: 19272890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Tone perception results with Harmony and HiRes 120 in Cantonese-speaking subjects.
    Lee KY; Luk BP; Wong TK; Tong MC; Van Hasselt CA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():68-73. PubMed ID: 19156707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Variables predicting outcomes on listening and communication enhancement (LACE) training.
    Henderson Sabes J; Sweetow RW
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jul; 46(7):374-83. PubMed ID: 17680469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Review of current status of cochlear prostheses.
    White RL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 Apr; 29(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 6896043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effect of frequency boundary assignment on speech recognition with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.
    Fourakis MS; Hawks JW; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Holden TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Sep; 18(8):700-17. PubMed ID: 18326156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Multi-strategy and multi-algorithm cochlear prostheses.
    Mouïne J; Chtourou Z
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2000; 36():233-8. PubMed ID: 10834238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Comparison of current speech coding strategies.
    Whitford LA; Seligman PM; Blamey PJ; McDermott HJ; Patrick JF
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():85-90. PubMed ID: 8273506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A simulation of current focusing and steering with penetrating optic nerve electrodes.
    Li M; Yan Y; Wang Q; Zhao H; Chai X; Sui X; Ren Q; Li L
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Dec; 10(6):066007. PubMed ID: 24140618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Investigation of electric current perception thresholds of different EHS groups.
    Schröttner J; Leitgeb N; Hillert L
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Apr; 28(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 17080457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.