These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18224540)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus human FSH in intrauterine insemination cycles: a statistical model-derived analysis.
    Gerli S; Bini V; Di Renzo GC
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2008 Jan; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18224540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recombinant versus urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective, randomized analysis of cost effectiveness.
    Gerli S; Casini ML; Unfer V; Costabile L; Bini V; Di Renzo GC
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82(3):573-8. PubMed ID: 15374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of HP-human FSH (Fostimon®) versus rFSH (Gonal-F®) in IVF-ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis.
    Gerli S; Bini V; Favilli A; Di Renzo GC
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2013 Jun; 29(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 23356335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of aromatase inhibitor co-treatment for controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Bedaiwy MA; Forman R; Mousa NA; Al Inany HG; Casper RF
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Nov; 21(11):2838-44. PubMed ID: 16877370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility.
    Dankert T; Kremer JA; Cohlen BJ; Hamilton CJ; Pasker-de Jong PC; Straatman H; van Dop PA
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Mar; 22(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 17110396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Markov model of the cost-effectiveness of human-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus recombinant FSH using comparative clinical trial data.
    Hatoum HT; Keye WR; Marrs RP; Walton SM; Marshall DC
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):804-7. PubMed ID: 15749525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of recombinant versus human derived follicle stimulating hormone on the oocyte and embryo quality in IVF-ICSI cycles: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial.
    Abate A; Nazzaro A; Salerno A; Marzano F; Pavone Cossut MR; Perino M
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2009 Aug; 25(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 19572228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical efficacy of highly purified urinary FSH versus recombinant FSH in volunteers undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a randomized, multicenter, investigator-blind trial.
    Baker VL; Fujimoto VY; Kettel LM; Adamson GD; Hoehler F; Jones CE; Soules MR
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1005-11. PubMed ID: 18367182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized study.
    Demirol A; Gurgan T
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 16954409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-saving treatment strategies in in vitro fertilization: a combined economic evaluation of two large randomized clinical trials comparing highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alpha.
    Wechowski J; Connolly M; Schneider D; McEwan P; Kennedy R
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1067-76. PubMed ID: 18339384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of daily and alternate day recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation protocols for intrauterine insemination.
    Kabli N; Sylvestre C; Tulandi T; Buckett W
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1141-4. PubMed ID: 18342857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled trial comparing superovulation with letrozole versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone combined with intrauterine insemination for couples with unexplained infertility who had failed clomiphene citrate stimulation and intrauterine insemination.
    Gregoriou O; Vlahos NF; Konidaris S; Papadias K; Botsis D; Creatsas GK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):678-83. PubMed ID: 17961561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recombinant vs. urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination. A randomized study.
    Isaza V; Requena A; García-Velasco JA; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Simón C
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 48(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 12621795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guideline adherence is worth the effort: a cost-effectiveness analysis in intrauterine insemination care.
    Haagen EC; Nelen WL; Adang EM; Grol RP; Hermens RP; Kremer JA
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 23202990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Preliminary results of effectiveness of two schemes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols with recombinant foliculle stimulating hormone in intrauterine insemination cycles].
    Barros Delgadillo JC; Fiszman Amora R; Santibañez Morales A; Sánchez Solis V; Gaviño Gaviño F
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2012 Feb; 80(2):61-72. PubMed ID: 22519213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oral ovulation induction agents combined with low-dose gonadotropin injections and intrauterine insemination: cost- and clinical effectiveness.
    Ryan GL; Moss V; Davis WA; Sparks AE; Dokras A; Van Voorhis BJ
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Dec; 50(12):943-50. PubMed ID: 16444896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles: a prospective randomized study.
    Erdem A; Erdem M; Atmaca S; Guler I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2508-13. PubMed ID: 18692788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrauterine insemination.
    ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
    Hum Reprod Update; 2009; 15(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 19240042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Homologous intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a comparison among three different regimens.
    Casadei L; Zamaro V; Calcagni M; Ticconi C; Dorrucci M; Piccione E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 16687201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of highly purified urinary FSH and recombinant FSH on haemostasis: an open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
    Ricci G; Cerneca F; Simeone R; Pozzobon C; Guarnieri S; Sartore A; Pregazzi R; Guaschino S
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):838-48. PubMed ID: 15016779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.