These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1822470)

  • 1. Effect of hearing impairment on event-related potentials for tone and speech distinctions.
    Wall LG; Dalebout SD; Davidson SA; Fox RA
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1991; 43(6):265-74. PubMed ID: 1822470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Martin BA; Tremblay KL; Korczak P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 18453883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing Loss and Age-Induced Changes in the Central Auditory System Measured by the P3 Response to Small Changes in Frequency.
    Vander Werff KR; Nesbitt KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):373-384. PubMed ID: 28534728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of association between otoacoustic emissions and hearing difficulty in subjects with normal hearing thresholds.
    Lutman ME; Saunders GH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):1184-5. PubMed ID: 1506523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Frequency-dependent cochlear microphonics in inner ear hearing loss with various pitch thresholds].
    Marangos N; Hesse G; Mausolf A
    HNO; 1989 Jan; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 2917880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Rare audiometry findings in progressive, monosymptomatic low frequency deafness].
    Hoppe U; Rosanowski F; Delb W; Iro H
    HNO; 2001 Sep; 49(9):739-43. PubMed ID: 11593776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological and behavioural processing of complex acoustic cues.
    Mathew AK; Purdy SC; Welch D; Pontoppidan NH; Rønne FM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):779-789. PubMed ID: 25921025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of simulated bilateral cochlear distortion on speech discrimination in normal subjects.
    Hood JD; Prasher DK
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 2336539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sudden cortical hearing loss for speech: a case report.
    Akkuzu B; Fişiloğlu AG; Ozlüoğlu L; Can U
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 11271972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reaction times at auditory threshold: a comparison of normal hearing probands and patients with hearing damage].
    Hustert B; Kumpf W; Stoll W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Mar; 75(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 8652028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrocochleographic documentation of temporal findings of speech perception in normal and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Shinohara S; Shoji K; Kojima H; Honjo I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(10):491-5. PubMed ID: 10638355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Measurement of the frequency-resolving power of hearing by evoked potentials].
    Supin AIa; Novikova LA; Rybalko NV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(4):588-93. PubMed ID: 3666362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of vowel auditory training on concurrent speech segregation in hearing impaired children.
    Talebi H; Moossavi A; Lotfi Y; Faghihzadeh S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2015 Jan; 124(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 24973337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tonal confusions in Thai patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Nimitbunnasarn C; Amatyakul P; Gandour J; Carney A; Nimitbunnasarn C; Amatyakul P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 6717012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conclusion: predicting speech intelligibility by individual hearing-impaired listeners: the path forward.
    Grant KW; Bernstein JG; Summers V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 23636212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mismatch negativity to frequency changes: no evidence from human event-related brain potentials for categorical speech processing of complex tones resembling vowel formant structure.
    Jacobsen T
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 May; 362(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 15158015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.