These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1822470)

  • 21. [Differentiation of slight differences in tone frequency in subjects with perceptive hearing impairment (author's transl)].
    Gryczyński M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1981; 35(4-6):349-58. PubMed ID: 7342019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Measuring the frequency resolution capacity of hearing in the normal state and in neurosensory hearing loss].
    Novikova LA; Rybalko NV; Supin AIa
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1986; (6):26-31. PubMed ID: 3811111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effect of Aging and the High-Frequency Auditory Threshold on Speech-Evoked Mismatch Negativity in a Noisy Background.
    Chen J; Chen S; Zheng Y; Ou Y
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26650255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech recognition scores and ABR in cochlear impairment.
    Rawool VW
    Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 2756332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The process of distinguishing the pitch of sounds and auditory evoked potentials].
    Karaichev KI; Samoĭlovich LA; Mikhalevskaia MB; Finkel' NV
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1988; 14(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 3169427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Frequency specificity of acoustic evoked potentials of early and intermediate latency with high-pass noise masking].
    Anft D; Bartsch E; Scholz G; Mrowinski D
    HNO; 1998 May; 46(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 9647923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions in isolated high frequency, low frequency and middle frequency hearing].
    Mathis A; De Min N; Arnold W
    HNO; 1991 Feb; 39(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 2032875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Brus SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2999-3006. PubMed ID: 11425142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioural and event-related potentials evidence for pitch discrimination deficits in dyslexic children: improvement after intensive phonic intervention.
    Santos A; Joly-Pottuz B; Moreno S; Habib M; Besson M
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1080-90. PubMed ID: 17140611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pitch and voiced/unvoiced determination with an auditory model.
    Van Immerseel LM; Martens JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3511-26. PubMed ID: 1619127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Human frequency-following response to speech-like sounds: correlates of off-frequency masking.
    Krishnan A; Agrawal S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 19893303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New developments in the clinical application of auditory evoked potentials with children with multiple handicaps.
    Stein L; Kraus N; McGee T; Koch DB
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1995; 41():18-30. PubMed ID: 7544476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maturation of speech discrimination in 4- to 7-yr-old children as indexed by event-related potential mismatch responses.
    Shafer VL; Yu YH; Datta H
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):735-45. PubMed ID: 20562625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chang HW; Dillon H; Carter L; van Dun B; Young ST
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):663-70. PubMed ID: 22873205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of pitch violations depends upon the familiarity of intonational contour of sentences.
    Colombo L; Deguchi C; Boureux M; Sarlo M; Besson M
    Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):557-68. PubMed ID: 20451179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Neuro-otology].
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol Suppl; 1986; 2():268-88. PubMed ID: 3493760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Amplitude modulation following response (AMFR)--a method for objective frequency specific audiologic diagnosis].
    Pethe J; Begall K; Mühler R; Lottmann JK
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8851115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1236-49. PubMed ID: 3198862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.