325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18224745)
1. 'Value' debate ahead. Congress set to debate possibilities for P4P at CMS.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Dec 24-31; 37(51):12-3. PubMed ID: 18224745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response is mixed on CMS value-based purchasing paper.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Jul; 14(7):73-6. PubMed ID: 17784719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Command performance. CMS ready to debut pay-for-performance plan, but regardless of whether it's a hit, quality comparisons could be a rising star.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2007 Jul 2-9; 37(27):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 17821963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "P4P"--a force to be reckoned with.
Kahn C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):12. PubMed ID: 16075769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CMS extends deadline, but some say '09 still too soon for quality measures.
DoBias M
Mod Healthc; 2006 Nov; 36(44):8-9. PubMed ID: 17128944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Paying more for results. CMS tries to enlist Premier to tie hospital reimbursement to quality performance.
Duff S
Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(37):9. PubMed ID: 12375411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pay for performance and the hospital quality initiative.
Elliott B
Del Med J; 2005 Aug; 77(8):289-96. PubMed ID: 16184783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AHA seeks deadline extension. CMS program raises issues, association contends.
DoBia M
Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(36):8-9. PubMed ID: 17982770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ensure quality indicators are documented.
Hosp Case Manag; 2005 Oct; 13(10):147-8. PubMed ID: 16218543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. To participate or not in the physician quality reporting initiative (PQRI); that is the question.
Elliott B
Del Med J; 2007 May; 79(5):197-204. PubMed ID: 17536577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public reporting and pay for performance.
Mansi IA
N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(17):1783; author reply 1784. PubMed ID: 17465041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare's pay-for-performance on the horizon.
Jain M
Tenn Med; 2005 Dec; 98(12):580-1. PubMed ID: 16401051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pay for reporting: the 2007 1.5% Medicare bonus.
Nicoletti B
J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 22(6):348-9. PubMed ID: 17612310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. P4P--the next generation. Providers need to be involved in designing new incentive payment programs.
Norling R
Mod Healthc; 2006 Nov; 36(46):20. PubMed ID: 17153788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pay for performance at the tipping point.
Epstein AM
N Engl J Med; 2007 Feb; 356(5):515-7. PubMed ID: 17259445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality measures gain importance as CMS moves to value-based purchasing.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Aug; 15(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 17691253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring for Medicare: the physician quality reporting initiative.
Bagley B
Fam Pract Manag; 2007 Jun; 14(6):37-40. PubMed ID: 17598633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Achieving process innovation: Washington hospital improves capacity, quality and nets CMS, P4P honors.
Couture ES; Fisher BA
Healthc Exec; 2009; 24(2):24-6, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 19326744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
