These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18226996)

  • 1. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term clinical and radiographic outcome.
    Witzleb WC; Arnold M; Krummenauer F; Knecht A; Ranisch H; Günther KP
    Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18226996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Wera GD; Gillespie RJ; Petty C; Petersilge WJ; Kraay MJ; Goldberg VM
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Aug; 39(8):E78-83. PubMed ID: 20882209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
    Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.
    Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience.
    Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre.
    Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G
    Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty. Surgical Technique.
    Amstutz HC; Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():234-49. PubMed ID: 16951096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.
    Uemura K; Takao M; Hamada H; Sakai T; Ohzono K; Sugano N
    J Artif Organs; 2018 Mar; 21(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28856453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Our midterm results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing with and without navigation.
    El Hachmi M; Penasse M
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):808-12. PubMed ID: 24140277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High wear rates and extensive osteolysis in 3 types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a review of the PCA, the Harris Galante and the Profile/Tri-Lock Plus arthroplasties with a minimum of 12 years median follow-up in 96 hips.
    Hallan G; Lie SA; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 16929433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The outcomes of hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty in Men.
    Issa K; Palich A; Tatevossian T; Kapadia BH; Naziri Q; Mont MA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 May; 14():161. PubMed ID: 23656900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Excellent long-term survival of an uncemented press-fit stem and screw cup in young patients: follow-up of 75 hips for 15-18 years.
    Reigstad O; Siewers P; Røkkum M; Espehaug B
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Apr; 79(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 18484244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten-year results after cementless THA with a sandwich-type alumina ceramic bearing.
    Park YS; Park SJ; Lim SJ
    Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):796. PubMed ID: 21053885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results.
    Khan M; Kuiper JH; Edwards D; Robinson E; Richardson JB
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1044-50. PubMed ID: 18834698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using a threaded cup and a rectangular tapered stem. Follow-up for ten to 17 years.
    Pospischill M; Knahr K
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Sep; 87(9):1210-5. PubMed ID: 16129743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing radiographic evaluation techniques.
    Ramakrishnan R; Jaffe WL; Kennedy WR
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1099-104. PubMed ID: 18534485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical and radiographic 13-year follow-up study of 138 Charnley hip arthroplasties in patients 50-70 years old: comparison of university hospital data and registry data.
    Hulleberg G; Aamodt A; Espehaug B; Benum P
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Oct; 79(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 18839366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.