77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18227107)
1. Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evolution of randomized control trials.
Selman TJ; Johnson NP; Zamora J; Khan KS
Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):827-31. PubMed ID: 18227107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evidence-based surgery is no passing fad.
Johnson NP; Selman T; Zamora J; Khan KS
Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):832-9. PubMed ID: 18245509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility.
Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A
Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes as governed by the CONSORT statement.
Ziogas DC; Zintzaras E
Ann Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 19(7):494-500. PubMed ID: 19523596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study.
Fenwick J; Needleman IG; Moles DR
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-82. PubMed ID: 18840153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.
Tiruvoipati R; Balasubramanian SP; Atturu G; Peek GJ; Elbourne D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16872940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of surgical randomized controlled trials for acute cholecystitis: assessment based on CONSORT and additional check items.
Shikata S; Nakayama T; Yamagishi H
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2008; 15(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 18535768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recommendations for reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions: Explanation and elaboration.
Gagnier JJ; Boon H; Rochon P; Moher D; Barnes J; Bombardier C;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 59(11):1134-49. PubMed ID: 17027423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement.
Kane RL; Wang J; Garrard J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17292017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The number, content, and quality of randomized controlled trials in the prevention and care of injuries.
Stelfox HT; Goverman J
J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1488-93. PubMed ID: 19077647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study.
Wen J; Ren Y; Wang L; Li Y; Liu Y; Zhou M; Liu P; Ye L; Li Y; Tian W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):770-5. PubMed ID: 18411041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the evidence: statistical methods in randomized controlled trials in the urological literature.
Scales CD; Norris RD; Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Peterson BL; Dahm P
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1463-7. PubMed ID: 18710745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evidence-based clinical practice].
Gluud C
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 24(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 12905675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses: basic criteria in the world of scientific evidence].
Purgato M; Cipriani A; Barbui C
Riv Psichiatr; 2012; 47(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 22358214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
