These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Karlin v. Foust United States District Court western District of Wisconsin June 19, 1997. Bostrom B Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):377-88. PubMed ID: 10231999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Souter questions a curb on doctors: Justices skeptical of federal bar to advice on abortion. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11647430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Rust v. Sullivan: a better debate. America (NY); 1991 Jun; 164(22):611. PubMed ID: 15991418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters. Glantz LH Am J Public Health; 1986 Dec; 76(12):1452-5. PubMed ID: 3777296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The evolution of a constitutional right to an abortion. Fashioned in the 1970s and secured in the 1980s. Ford N J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):271-322. PubMed ID: 6355342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests. Jones CJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Rossiter GP Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process. Goldstein RD William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma. Eller TR Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Justice Blackmun and legal abortion--a besieged legacy to women's reproductive health. Cates W; Grimes DA; Hogue LL Am J Public Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 7661225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]