199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18228467)
1. Comparative genomic hybridization.
Bayani J; Squire JA
Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2005 Jan; Chapter 22():Unit 22.6. PubMed ID: 18228467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvements in cytogenetic slide preparation: controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing.
Henegariu O; Heerema NA; Lowe Wright L; Bray-Ward P; Ward DC; Vance GH
Cytometry; 2001 Feb; 43(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 11169574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of genomic aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization of metaphase chromosomes.
Carless M
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 523():177-202. PubMed ID: 19381938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chromosome Painting by GISH and Multicolor FISH.
Xu SS; Liu Z; Zhang Q; Niu Z; Jan CC; Cai X
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1429():7-21. PubMed ID: 27511163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative genomic hybridization: technical development and cytogenetic aspects for routine use in clinical laboratories.
Lapierre JM; Cacheux V; Da Silva F; Collot N; Hervy N; Wiss J; Tachdjian G
Ann Genet; 1998; 41(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 9599653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative genomic hybridization.
DeVries S; Gray JW; Pinkel D; Waldman FM; Sudar D
Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2001 May; Chapter 4():Unit4.6. PubMed ID: 18428281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct fluorescence in situ hybridization on human metaphase chromosomes using quantum dot-platinum labeled DNA probes.
Hwang G; Lee H; Lee J
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2015 Nov; 467(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 26449454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
Rao PH
Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Selective chromosome painting using in situ hybridization].
Pérez Losada A; Woessner S; Solé F; Caballín MR; Florensa L
Sangre (Barc); 1993 Apr; 38(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 8516730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of genomic aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization of metaphase chromosomes.
Carless MA
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1288():67-94. PubMed ID: 25827876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ULS: a versatile method of labeling nucleic acids for FISH based on a monofunctional reaction of cisplatin derivatives with guanine moieties.
Wiegant JC; van Gijlswijk RP; Heetebrij RJ; Bezrookove V; Raap AK; Tanke HJ
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1999; 87(1-2):47-52. PubMed ID: 10640810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytogenetic profiling using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Thompson CT; Gray JW
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1993; 17G():139-43. PubMed ID: 8007691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current status of fluorescent in-situ hybridisation.
Jain KK
Med Device Technol; 2004 May; 15(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 15303557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH).
Bayani J; Squire JA
Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2004 Sep; Chapter 22():Unit 22.4. PubMed ID: 18228455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [CGH (comparative genomic hybridization)].
Sakamoto M; Sakamoto H; Suehiro Y; Akiya T; Iwabuchi H; Sakunaga H; Muroya T; Noda T; Sugishita T; Tenjin Y
Nihon Rinsho; 1996 Apr; 54(4):933-43. PubMed ID: 8920653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization with repetitive DNA probes: quantification by digital image analysis.
Celeda D; Aldinger K; Haar FM; Hausmann M; Durm M; Ludwig H; Cremer C
Cytometry; 1994 Sep; 17(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 8001456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [In situ hybridization techniques. Basis and applications in hematologic neoplasias].
Espinet B; Lloveras E; Solé F
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Aug; 44(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 10589277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
