These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18228557)

  • 1. Maximizing association statistics over genetic models.
    González JR; Carrasco JL; Dudbridge F; Armengol L; Estivill X; Moreno V
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 32(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 18228557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Order-restricted scores test for the evaluation of population-based case-control studies when the genetic model is unknown.
    Hothorn LA; Hothorn T
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):659-69. PubMed ID: 19650055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage group sequential robust tests in family-based association studies: controlling type I error.
    Yan LK; Zheng G; Li Z
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; 72(Pt 4):557-65. PubMed ID: 18325081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic model testing and statistical power in population-based association studies of quantitative traits.
    Lettre G; Lange C; Hirschhorn JN
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 17352422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of max and min scores for trend tests for association when the genetic model is unknown.
    Zheng G
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(16):2657-66. PubMed ID: 12898550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A powerful method of combining measures of association and Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for fine-mapping in case-control studies.
    Song K; Elston RC
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):105-26. PubMed ID: 16220513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic control for association studies under various genetic models.
    Zheng G; Freidlin B; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 15737092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An optimal dose-effect mode trend test for SNP genotype tables.
    Yamada R; Okada Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):114-27. PubMed ID: 18688846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving power for testing genetic association in case-control studies by reducing the alternative space.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Zheng G
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):266-76. PubMed ID: 19397584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two-phase analyses for case-control genetic association studies.
    Zheng G; Meyer M; Li W; Yang Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):5054-75. PubMed ID: 18570272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust Mantel-Haenszel test under genetic model uncertainty allowing for covariates in case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Fung WK
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 35(7):695-705. PubMed ID: 22009791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency robust statistics for genetic linkage and association studies under genetic model uncertainty.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Chen Z; Zheng G
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):158-80. PubMed ID: 19918942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Gastwirth JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3150-9. PubMed ID: 16397860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymptotic distribution for epistatic tests in case-control studies.
    Liu T; Thalamuthu A; Liu JJ; Chen C; Wang Z; Wu R
    Genomics; 2011 Aug; 98(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 21620949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selecting a contingency table in a population-based association study: allele frequency or positivity?
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 1999; 44(4):246-8. PubMed ID: 10429364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical model for estimating significance levels of non-parametric linkage statistics for large pedigrees.
    Brock GN; Weeks DE; Sobel E; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):417-30. PubMed ID: 17508354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.
    Gordon D; Haynes C; Yang Y; Kramer PL; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 17565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotypic relative risks under ordered restriction.
    Chiano MN; Clayton DG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 9554552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test.
    El Galta R; Stijnen T; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4596-609. PubMed ID: 18551534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.