BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18228706)

  • 1. [Biological markers: what changes with prophylaxis?].
    Mannessier L
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36 Suppl 1():S9-11. PubMed ID: 18228706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rh-immunoglobulin: Rh prophylaxis.
    Bowman J
    Best Pract Res Clin Haematol; 2006; 19(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16377539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of monoclonal anti-D immunoglobulin in comparison with polyclonal anti-D immunoglobulin in prevention of rho isoimmunization.
    Chauhan AR; Bhattacharyya MS; Turakhia N; Daftary GV
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2002 Oct; 50():1341-2. PubMed ID: 12568238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Antenatal anti-Rh(D) antigen prophylaxis].
    Katsulov A;
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40 Suppl 5():3-7. PubMed ID: 11785354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Antenatal anti-Rh(D) antigen prophylaxis of Rh/-/- pregnancy in women on first consultation at the St. Sofia Obstetrics-Gynecology Hospital -- Sofia].
    Katsulov A; Iankov M; Zlateva K; Blagova A; Gogova K; Savova S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40 Suppl 5():7-8. PubMed ID: 11785356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the immunologic basis of Rh immune globulin (anti-D) prophylaxis.
    Kumpel BM
    Transfusion; 2006 Sep; 46(9):1652-6. PubMed ID: 16965599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of the clinical effectiveness of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus-negative women who are pregnant.
    Jones ML; Wray J; Wight J; Chilcott J; Forman K; Tappenden P; Beverley C
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):892-902. PubMed ID: 15327601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Consensus Conference on anti-D prophylaxis, 7-8 April 1997.
    Br J Haematol; 1997 Jun; 97(4):927-8. PubMed ID: 9217199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do Rh-negative women with first trimester spontaneous abortions need Rh immune globulin?
    Hannafin B; Lovecchio F; Blackburn P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Jul; 24(4):487-9. PubMed ID: 16787810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anti-D guidelines.
    Kanjilal K; Tasker M
    Br J Fam Plann; 2000 Oct; 26(4):244. PubMed ID: 11053891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anti-D administration in early pregnancy--time for a new protocol.
    Carmody F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 May; 36(2):227-8. PubMed ID: 8798328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Prenatal immunoglobulin prevention in Rh(D)-negative nonsensitized pregnant women].
    Katsulov A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1997; 36(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 9471891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kleihauer testing. Many cases of sensitisation may be avoidable.
    Murphy WG; Ghosh S; Hughes RH; Craig JI; Greer IA
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6957):806. PubMed ID: 7848430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kleihauer testing. Need not be abandoned.
    Love EM; Shwe KH
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6957):805. PubMed ID: 7950581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Prevention of Rh immunization. II. Management of the risk during the second half of pregnancy and postpartum].
    Larsen JF; Bock JE; Jørgensen JR
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Aug; 166(36):3078-83. PubMed ID: 15387304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochrane made simple. Anti-D administration during pregnancy for preventing Rhesus isoimmunisation.
    Anderson T
    Pract Midwife; 1999 Jun; 2(6):10. PubMed ID: 10481667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rho(D) immune globulin: pros, cons, indications, and alternatives.
    Romm AJ
    Birth Gaz; 1999; 15(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 10474330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Weak D (Du) phenotype and pregnancy].
    Stefanova A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 15853015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compliance with routine antenatal rhesus D prophylaxis and the impact on sensitisations: observations over 14 years.
    MacKenzie IZ; Findlay J; Thompson K; Roseman F
    BJOG; 2006 Jul; 113(7):839-43. PubMed ID: 16827770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. Guidelines are not followed in many cases.
    McFadyen IR; Martlew VJ; Howard HL; Clarke CA
    BMJ; 1998 Apr; 316(7138):1165. PubMed ID: 9569417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.