These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18229554)

  • 1. An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures.
    Ponterotto JG; Ruckdeschel DE
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):997-1014. PubMed ID: 18229554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel's (2007) reliability matrix for estimating the adequacy of internal consistency coefficients.
    Ponterotto JG; Charter RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):878-86. PubMed ID: 19725323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric inferences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coefficients.
    Botella J; Suero M; Gambara H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):386-97. PubMed ID: 20853953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?
    Baguley T
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 100(Pt 3):603-17. PubMed ID: 19017432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.
    Chiba R; Miyamoto Y; Kawakami N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 19679304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple computational alternative to analysis of variance formulas for estimating the k-judge reliability.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):514-6. PubMed ID: 15154180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.
    Jackson DL; Gillaspy JA; Purc-Stephenson R
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):6-23. PubMed ID: 19271845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.
    Dunn TJ; Baguley T; Brunsden V
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Aug; 105(3):399-412. PubMed ID: 24844115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advice on total-score reliability issues in psychosomatic measurement.
    Sijtsma K; Emons WH
    J Psychosom Res; 2011 Jun; 70(6):565-72. PubMed ID: 21624580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure.
    Russell DW
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Feb; 66(1):20-40. PubMed ID: 8576833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.
    Radwin LE; Cabral HJ
    J Adv Nurs; 2010 Mar; 66(3):683-9. PubMed ID: 20423403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the integrity of reliability estimation in classical test theory: the case for an additive coefficient of stability.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Oct; 103(2):545-65. PubMed ID: 19102480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients.
    Kartal A; Ozsoy SA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Nov; 44(8):1447-58. PubMed ID: 17655849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12741676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Italian version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ-I): cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
    Monticone M; Baiardi P; Bonetti F; Ferrari S; Foti C; Pillastrini P; Rocca B; Vanti C; Zanoli G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Mar; 37(6):E374-80. PubMed ID: 22422439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subject-centered scalability: the sine qua non of summated ratings.
    Drewes DW
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):258-74. PubMed ID: 19719361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and psychometric evaluation of the reciprocal empowerment scale.
    Klakovich M
    J Nurs Meas; 1995; 3(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 8935770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18649491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric qualities of the Brazilian versions of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and the Heaviness of Smoking Index.
    de Meneses-Gaya C; Zuardi AW; de Azevedo Marques JM; Souza RM; Loureiro SR; Crippa JA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2009 Oct; 11(10):1160-5. PubMed ID: 19596727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study samples are too small to produce sufficiently precise reliability coefficients.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 12773016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.