These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18230306)

  • 1. [Significance of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and multi-frequency auditory steady-state in diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing loss].
    Zhou F; Liu WW
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 25(12):739-40. PubMed ID: 18230306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an industrial setting.
    Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidou E; Korres S
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(43):103-10. PubMed ID: 19414930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Registration of evoked otoacoustic emission in the members of locomotive crews of the railroad service].
    Mukhamedova GR
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2009; (6):19-21. PubMed ID: 20081789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The interest of otoacoustic emissions in medical expertises for noise-induced hearing loss].
    Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 Jul; 88(7):479-81. PubMed ID: 19572241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Prospects for the use of histaminergic preparations for the purpose of noise otoprotection].
    Matsnev EI; Sigaleva EE
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2011; (3):59-64. PubMed ID: 21720297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Interactions between solvents and noise: state of the art].
    Volpin A; Saia B
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2006; 28(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 16705885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Recording otoacoustic emissions in expert evaluation of chronic noise-induced hearing loss].
    Plinkert PK; de Maddalena H
    HNO; 1996 Jun; 44(6):313-8. PubMed ID: 8767127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Is otoacoustic emission useful in the differential diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing loss?].
    Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Kotylo P
    Med Pr; 1997; 48(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 9558629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission spectra and high-resolution audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss.
    Avan P; Bonfils P
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):68-75. PubMed ID: 16112827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions as a sensitive indicator of hearing loss in pilots.
    Zhang Y; Zhang X; Zhu W; Zheng X; Deng X
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Jan; 75(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 14736132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting incipient inner-ear damage from impulse noise with otoacoustic emissions.
    Marshall L; Lapsley Miller JA; Heller LM; Wolgemuth KS; Hughes LM; Smith SD; Kopke RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):995-1013. PubMed ID: 19206875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of hearing threshold shift measured by otoacoustic emissions in soldiers after shooting with use hearing protectors].
    Olszewski J; Miłońiski J; Olszewski S
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 16871954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of dynamic changes in hearing impairment in subjects exposed to noise while testing for transient evoked otoacoustic emission].
    Namysłowski G; Trybalska G; Morawski K
    Med Pr; 1997; 48(6):621-9. PubMed ID: 9558630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to low levels of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Sisto R; Chelotti S; Moriconi L; Pellegrini S; Citroni A; Monechi V; Gaeta R; Pinto I; Stacchini N; Moleti A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):387-401. PubMed ID: 17614498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Peculiarities of the development of occupational deafness in the workers of "noisy" professions employed in experimental mechanical engineering].
    Sineva EL; Preobrazhenskaia EA; Izmaĭlova OA; Tedeev AIu
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2009; (6):10-3. PubMed ID: 20081787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impulse noise influence on hearing].
    Konopka W; Olszewski J; Pietkiewicz P; Mielczarek M
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Sep; 19(111):296-7. PubMed ID: 16358848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Marshall L; Heller LM; Hughes LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):280-96. PubMed ID: 16875225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: a study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    LePage EL; Murray NM
    Med J Aust; 1998 Dec 7-21; 169(11-12):588-92. PubMed ID: 9887901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it necessary to penalize impulsive noise +5 dB due to higher risk of hearing damage?
    de Toro MA; Ordoñez R; Reuter K; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3808-17. PubMed ID: 21682404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Complicated non-steady state noise induced hearing injury of workers].
    Zhang J; Jia L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 28(6):478-9. PubMed ID: 21033177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.