BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18230395)

  • 1. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Reddy SA; Hicks ML
    J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
    Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of amounts of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Hinrichs RE; Walker WA; Schindler WG
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9641140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
    Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles.
    Altundasar E; Nagas E; Uyanik O; Serper A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):e31-5. PubMed ID: 21778084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
    Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile .04 Taper series 29.
    Beeson TJ; Hartwell GR; Thornton JD; Gunsolley JC
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 9487860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
    Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study.
    Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems.
    Desai P; Himel V
    J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 19345802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration.
    Fukumoto Y; Kikuchi I; Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 16454788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.