These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18230395)

  • 21. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems.
    Tanalp J; Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Bayirl G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 16448929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Mohammadi Z
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.
    Khademi A; Yazdizadeh M; Feizianfard M
    J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 16631839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments.
    Toyoğlu M; Altunbaş D
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1565-1568. PubMed ID: 28735794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
    Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
    Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using hand and three rotary instrumentation systems − An in vitro study.
    Madhusudhana K; Mathew VB; Reddy NM
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2010 Oct; 1(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 22114427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extrusion of debris after use of rotary nickel-titanium files with different pitch: a pilot study.
    Elmsallati EA; Wadachi R; Suda H
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19703077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials.
    Somma F; Cammarota G; Plotino G; Grande NM; Pameijer CH
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 18358899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment.
    Masiero AV; Barletta FB
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 15606816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth.
    Gungor OE; Kustarci A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):490-495. PubMed ID: 27805889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
    De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of apical extrusion of NaOCl using the EndoVac or needle irrigation of root canals.
    Mitchell RP; Yang SE; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):338-41. PubMed ID: 20113804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.
    Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Schneider FH; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16545721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems.
    Uzun I; Güler B; Özyürek T; Tunc T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 26755222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.