These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18230867)

  • 1. The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect.
    Patel R; Schell KW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):209-20. PubMed ID: 18230867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic changes in the production of lexical stress during Lombard speech.
    Arciuli J; Simpson BS; Vogel AP; Ballard KJ
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):149-62. PubMed ID: 25102603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Communicating emotion: linking affective prosody and word meaning.
    Nygaard LC; Queen JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1017-30. PubMed ID: 18665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of spasmodic dysphonia speech in background noise.
    McColl D; McCaffrey P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Oct; 103(2):629-35. PubMed ID: 17165426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of tonal movement and vowel quality on intelligibility in singing.
    Andreas T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16517520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. T'ain't the way you say it, it's what you say--perceptual continuity of voice and top-down restoration of speech.
    Clarke J; Gaudrain E; Chatterjee M; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Sep; 315():80-7. PubMed ID: 25019356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect.
    Garnier M; Henrich N; Dubois D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):588-608. PubMed ID: 20008681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
    Ferrand CT
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic and perceptual cues for compound-phrasal contrasts in Vietnamese.
    Nguyen AT; Ingram JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1746. PubMed ID: 17927434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influence of human personal features on acoustic correlates of speech emotional intonation characteristics].
    Dmitrieva ES; Gel'man VIa; Zaĭtseva KA; Orlov AM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2009; 59(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19947529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female voice communications in high levels of aircraft cockpit noises--Part I: spectra, levels, and microphones.
    Nixon CW; Morris LJ; McCavitt AR; McKinley RL; Anderson TR; McDaniel MP; Yeager DG
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1998 Jul; 69(7):675-83. PubMed ID: 9681374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of loud and amplified speech on sentence and word intelligibility in Parkinson disease.
    Neel AT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):1021-33. PubMed ID: 18978211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive maturation and the use of pitch and rate information in making similarity judgments of a single talker.
    Petrini K; Tagliapietra S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):485-501. PubMed ID: 18367691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timbral influences on vocal pitch-matching accuracy.
    Watts CR; Hall MD
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2008; 33(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 18569646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
    McColl DA
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 16377128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.
    Fogerty D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3114-25. PubMed ID: 21110607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.