152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1823150)
1. The identification of photoallergic potential in the local lymph node assay.
Scholes EW; Basketter DA; Lovell WW; Sarll AE; Pendlington RU
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1991 Dec; 8(6):249-54. PubMed ID: 1823150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA
Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay.
Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Cooper KJ; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10594296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization testing.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 598():221-31. PubMed ID: 19967517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New approach to predict photoallergic potentials of chemicals based on murine local lymph node assay.
Maeda Y; Hirosaki H; Yamanaka H; Takeyoshi M
J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Oct; 38(10):1316-1322. PubMed ID: 29797419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased cell proliferation in spleen and lymph nodes peripheral to contact allergen application site.
Chipinda I; Anderson SE; Butterworth LF; Beezhold D; Siegel PD
Toxicology; 2009 Mar; 257(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 19150643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of drug allergenicity: possible use of the local lymph node assay.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2001 Jan; 4(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11727324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel.
Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):258-73. PubMed ID: 11754530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of UVB and UVA to induce and elicit contact photoallergy in the mouse.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1990 Feb; 7(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 2371165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Farr C; McLaughlin J; Berdasco N; Wiench K; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.
Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. B220 analysis with the local lymph node assay: proposal for a more flexible prediction model.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Lalko J; Api AM
J Appl Toxicol; 2007; 27(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 17541942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT).
Kreiling R; Hollnagel HM; Hareng L; Eigler D; Lee MS; Griem P; Dreessen B; Kleber M; Albrecht A; Garcia C; Wendel A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1896-904. PubMed ID: 18343554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lack of association between interleukin-6 production by contact allergen-activated draining lymph node cells and lymphoproliferative activity.
Lappin MB; Dearman RJ; Norval M; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9471985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
