These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1823150)

  • 21. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
    Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Harvey P; Evans P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes.
    Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
    J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.
    Lea LJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 10594297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.
    Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Proliferative responses in the local lymph node assay associated with concomitant exposure to 1,4-phenylenediamine and methyldibromo glutaronitrile: evidence for synergy?
    Jowsey IR; Basketter DA; Irwin A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Aug; 59(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18759875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A draining lymph node assay (DLNA) for assessing the sensitizing potential of proteins.
    Boverhof DR; Gollapudi BB; Hotchkiss JA; Osterloh-Quiroz M; Woolhiser MR
    Toxicol Lett; 2010 Mar; 193(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 20060446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure.
    De Jong WH; Arts JH; De Klerk A; Schijf MA; Ezendam J; Kuper CF; Van Loveren H
    Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of an ex vivo local lymph node assay to assess contact hypersensitivity potential.
    Piccotti JR; Kawabata TT
    J Immunotoxicol; 2008 Jul; 5(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 18830887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.
    Basketter DA; Clapp C; Jefferies D; Safford B; Ryan CA; Gerberick F; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 16283904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
    Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
    Basketter DA; Gerberick F; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of the occlusive patch to evaluate the photosensitive properties of chemicals in guinea-pigs.
    Buehler EV; Newmann EA; Parker RD
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Jul; 23(7):689-94. PubMed ID: 4029836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The local lymph node assay (LLNA).
    Rovida C; Ryan C; Cinelli S; Basketter D; Dearman R; Kimber I
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2012 Feb; Chapter 20():Unit 20.7. PubMed ID: 22511117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Local lymph node assays.
    Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2004; Chapter 18():Unit18.2. PubMed ID: 23045102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K; Akkan Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter-laboratory validation of the modified murine local lymph node assay based on 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation.
    Kojima H; Takeyoshi M; Sozu T; Awogi T; Arima K; Idehara K; Ikarashi Y; Kanazawa Y; Maki E; Omori T; Yuasa A; Yoshimura I
    J Appl Toxicol; 2011 Jan; 31(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 20677212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon-gamma and interleukin 12.
    Dearman RJ; Hilton J; Basketter DA; Kimber I
    J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 10362264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interlaboratory validation of 1% pluronic l92 surfactant as a suitable, aqueous vehicle for testing pesticide formulations using the murine local lymph node assay.
    Boverhof DR; Wiescinski CM; Botham P; Lees D; Debruyne E; Repetto-Larsay M; Ladics G; Hoban D; Gamer A; Remmele M; Wang-Fan W; Ullmann LG; Mehta J; Billington R; Woolhiser MR
    Toxicol Sci; 2008 Sep; 105(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 18556666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental photoallergic contact dermatitis: a mouse model.
    Maguire HC; Kaidbey K
    J Invest Dermatol; 1982 Sep; 79(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 6980954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.