113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1823173)
1. Quantitation of structural distortion of the cervical neural foramina in gradient-echo MR imaging.
Tien RD; Buxton RB; Schwaighofer BW; Chu PK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 1823173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.
Tsuruda JS; Remley K
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 1902019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volume fast spin-echo imaging of the cervical spine.
Maldjian C; Adam RJ; Akhtar N; Bonakdarpour A; Boyko OB
Acad Radiol; 1999 Feb; 6(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12680429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the lumbar spine: comparison with spin-echo technique.
Watanabe AT; Teitelbaum GP; Lufkin RB; Tsuruda JS; Jinkins JR; Bradley WG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 2335609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images.
Port JD; Pomper MG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(6):958-64. PubMed ID: 11105718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine.
Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional and fast spin-echo MR imaging: minimizing echo time.
Vinitski S; Mitchell DG; Einstein SG; Rao VM; Flanders AE; Schweitzer ME; Listerud J; Schnall MD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(3):501-7. PubMed ID: 8324309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging.
Czervionke LF; Daniels DL; Wehrli FW; Mark LP; Hendrix LE; Strandt JA; Williams AL; Haughton VM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 3143237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical neural foramina: correlative anatomic and MR imaging study.
Czervionke LF; Daniels DL; Ho PS; Yu SW; Pech P; Strandt J; Williams AL; Haughton VM
Radiology; 1988 Dec; 169(3):753-9. PubMed ID: 3186997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of three-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and steady-state gradient echo sequences in axial MRI examination of the cervical spine].
Mahmutyazicioğlu K; Ozdemir H; Savranlar A; Ozer T; Erdem O; Erdem Z; Gündoğdu S
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 14730951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.
Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical spondylosis: three-dimensional gradient-echo MR with magnetization transfer.
Melhem ER; Benson ML; Beauchamp NJ; Lee RR
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Apr; 17(4):705-11. PubMed ID: 8730191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws.
Petersilge CA; Lewin JS; Duerk JL; Yoo JU; Ghaneyem AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1213-8. PubMed ID: 8615272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T1-weighted imaging of the brain at 3 tesla using a 2-dimensional spoiled gradient echo technique.
Runge VM; Patel MC; Baumann SS; Simonetta AB; Ponzo JA; Lesley WS; Calderwood GW; Naul LG
Invest Radiol; 2006 Feb; 41(2):68-75. PubMed ID: 16428975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.
Yousem DM; Atlas SW; Goldberg HI; Grossman RI
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 1902018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI.
Abduljalil AM; Robitaille PM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(6):832-41. PubMed ID: 10589555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying metal-induced susceptibility artifacts of the instrumented spine at 1.5T using fast-spin echo and 3D-multispectral MRI.
Kaushik SS; Karr R; Runquist M; Marszalkowski C; Sharma A; Rand SD; Maiman D; Koch KM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 27227824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radial Ultrashort TE Imaging Removes the Need for Breath-Holding in Hepatic Iron Overload Quantification by R2* MRI.
Tipirneni-Sajja A; Krafft AJ; McCarville MB; Loeffler RB; Song R; Hankins JS; Hillenbrand CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):187-194. PubMed ID: 28504544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
