These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1823173)

  • 21. Low flip angle gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 tesla.
    Holtås S; Ståhlberg F; Nilsson H; Larsson EM; Ericsson A
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 2775593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine.
    Levi AD; Choi WG; Keller PJ; Heiserman JE; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(11):1245-50; discussion 1251. PubMed ID: 9636978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging].
    Piesnack S; Oechtering G; Ludewig E
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2015; 43(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 25727725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Magnetization transfer contrast imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
    Yoshioka H; Nishimura H; Masuda T; Nakajima K; Onaya H; Itai Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(6):947-53. PubMed ID: 7962807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part I. General considerations and disk disease.
    Enzmann DR; Rubin JB
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):467-72. PubMed ID: 3336722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: evaluation of extradural disease.
    VanDyke C; Ross JS; Tkach J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 2750626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical spondylosis: contrast-enhanced magnetization transfer prepulsed 3D turbo field echo MR imaging.
    Melhem ER; Bert RJ; Faddoul SG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Mar; 11(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 10739561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Musculoskeletal MR imaging: turbo (fast) spin-echo versus conventional spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging at 0.5 tesla.
    Vahlensieck M; Lang P; Seelos K; Yang-Ho Sze D; Grampp S; Reiser M
    Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 7886469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fast spin-echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: influence of echo train length and echo spacing on image contrast and quality.
    Sze G; Kawamura Y; Negishi C; Constable RT; Merriam M; Oshio K; Jolesz F
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(5):1203-13. PubMed ID: 8237705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of susceptibility artifacts generated by microchips with different geometry at 1.5 Tesla magnet resonance imaging. A phantom pilot study referring to the ASTM standard test method F2119-07].
    Dengg S; Kneissl S
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2013; 41(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 24127025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 27715486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques.
    Tartaglino LM; Flanders AE; Vinitski S; Friedman DP
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):565-9. PubMed ID: 8284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Vaccaro AR; Chesnut RM; Scuderi G; Healy JF; Massie JB; Garfin SR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cardiac MRI: comparison between single-shot fast spin echo and conventional spin echo sequences in the morphological evaluation of the ventricles.
    Erriquez D; Di Cesare E; Barile A; Gallucci M; Splendiani A; Masciocchi C
    Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 11859299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 24925839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The Influence for Image Quality of Diffusion Weighted Image by Gradient Coil Systems].
    Yamasaki T; Ogawa K; Ishimori T; Nishimoto N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(4):314-321. PubMed ID: 31006751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gradient moment nulling in fast spin echo.
    Hinks RS; Constable RT
    Magn Reson Med; 1994 Dec; 32(6):698-706. PubMed ID: 7869891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reduction of phase error ghosting artifacts in thin slice fast spin-echo imaging.
    Wan X; Parker DL; Lee JN; Buswell HR; Gullberg GT
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Oct; 34(4):632-8. PubMed ID: 8524034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional gradient echo versus spin echo sequence in contrast-enhanced imaging of the pituitary gland at 3T.
    Kakite S; Fujii S; Kurosaki M; Kanasaki Y; Matsusue E; Kaminou T; Ogawa T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Jul; 79(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20116954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improved spectral selectivity and reduced susceptibility in SSFP using a near zero TE undersampled three-dimensional PR sequence.
    Lu A; Barger AV; Grist TM; Block WF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jan; 19(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 14696228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.