109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18232342)
1. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Carvalho JD; Santiago SA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18232342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spiculation-preserving polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Daloia de Carvalho J; Anchieta Santiago S
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2791-4. PubMed ID: 17945740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors.
Guliato D; de Carvalho JD; Rangayyan RM; Santiago SA
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 17972137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of fractal analysis to mammography.
Raguso G; Ancona A; Chieppa L; L'abbate S; Pepe ML; Mangieri F; De Palo M; Rangayyan RM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3182-5. PubMed ID: 21096599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Snakules: a model-based active contour algorithm for the annotation of spicules on mammography.
Muralidhar GS; Bovik AC; Giese JD; Sampat MP; Whitman GJ; Haygood TM; Stephens TW; Markey MK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1768-80. PubMed ID: 20529728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses.
Rangayyan RM; Mudigonda NR; Desautels JE
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 11094803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance.
Jiang L; Song E; Xu X; Ma G; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1534-44. PubMed ID: 19000870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms via the power spectra of their signatures.
Rangayyan RM; Oloumi F; Nguyen TM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6737-40. PubMed ID: 21095828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
Rojas-Domínguez A; Nandi AK
Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting and classifying linear structures in mammograms using random forests.
Berks M; Chen Z; Astley S; Taylor C
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2011; 22():510-24. PubMed ID: 21761682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí J; Pérez E; Pont J; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):87-110. PubMed ID: 20071209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
