BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18232342)

  • 21. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
    Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors.
    Rangayyan RM; El-Faramawy NM; Desautels JE; Alim OA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 9533580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation and comparison of the performance of state of the art approaches for the detection of spiculated masses in mammograms.
    Kage A; Elter M; Wittenberg T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3773-6. PubMed ID: 18002819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An efficient fractal method for detection and diagnosis of breast masses in mammograms.
    Beheshti SM; AhmadiNoubari H; Fatemizadeh E; Khalili M
    J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):661-9. PubMed ID: 24777687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Classification of breast masses in mammograms using genetic programming and feature selection.
    Nandi RJ; Nandi AK; Rangayyan RM; Scutt D
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 Aug; 44(8):683-94. PubMed ID: 16937210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
    Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
    Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shape analysis of microcalcifications using Radon transform.
    Bocchi L; Nori J
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Jul; 29(6):691-8. PubMed ID: 17081794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Study of mass segmentation algorithm for digital mammograms].
    Chen L; Zhang K; Jin Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 19166192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
    Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Wavelet-packet-based approach for breast cancer classification.
    Torabi M; Razavian SM; Vaziri R; Vosoughi-Vahdat B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5100-3. PubMed ID: 22255486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on the shortest path with endpoints learnt by SVMs.
    Domingues I; Cardoso JS; Amaral I; Moreira I; Passarinho P; Santa Comba J; Correia R; Cardoso MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3158-61. PubMed ID: 21096595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying effect-specific mammographic density.
    Raundahl J; Loog M; Pettersen P; Nielsen M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):580-7. PubMed ID: 18044615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of breast tissue classification techniques.
    Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martí R; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):872-9. PubMed ID: 17354855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of algorithms to enhance spicules of spiculated masses on mammography.
    Sampat MP; Whitman GJ; Bovik AC; Markey MK
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Mar; 21(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 17431720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of pixel resolution on texture features of breast masses in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM; Ayres FJ; Nandi AK
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 19756865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
    Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Linearization of mammograms using parameters derived from noise characteristics.
    Karssemeijer N; Snoeren PR; Zhang W
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():258-69. PubMed ID: 17354701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Breast cancer early diagnosis based on hybrid strategy.
    Li P; Bi T; Huang J; Li S
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3397-404. PubMed ID: 25227050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.