These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18232372)

  • 1. Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.
    Swaminathan J; Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Xu Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):281-7. PubMed ID: 18232372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem.
    Xu Y; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1601-5. PubMed ID: 17001276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.
    Krishnan A; Xu Y; Gandour J; Cariani P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 15935624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.
    Krishnan A; Swaminathan J; Gandour JT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1092-105. PubMed ID: 18702588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.
    Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 1313():124-33. PubMed ID: 19961835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch detection of dynamic iterated rippled noise by humans and a modified auditory model.
    Denham S
    Biosystems; 2005; 79(1-3):199-206. PubMed ID: 15649605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential sensitivity to changes in pitch acceleration in the auditory brainstem and cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Brain Lang; 2017 Jun; 169():22-27. PubMed ID: 28237533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem.
    Bidelman GM; Gandour JT; Krishnan A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):425-34. PubMed ID: 19925180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Language-dependent pitch encoding advantage in the brainstem is not limited to acceleration rates that occur in natural speech.
    Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Smalt CJ; Bidelman GM
    Brain Lang; 2010 Sep; 114(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 20570340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural encoding in the human brainstem relevant to the pitch of complex tones.
    Krishnan A; Plack CJ
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):110-9. PubMed ID: 21167923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise with positive or negative gain by chopper units in the cochlear nucleus.
    Verhey JL; Winter IM
    Hear Res; 2006; 216-217():43-51. PubMed ID: 16716545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recording human evoked potentials that follow the pitch contour of a natural vowel.
    Dajani HR; Purcell D; Wong W; Kunov H; Picton TW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Sep; 52(9):1614-8. PubMed ID: 16189976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between brainstem, cortical and behavioral measures relevant to pitch salience in humans.
    Krishnan A; Bidelman GM; Smalt CJ; Ananthakrishnan S; Gandour JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Oct; 50(12):2849-2859. PubMed ID: 22940428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of pitch processing: infants' discrimination of iterated rippled noise stimuli with unresolved spectral content.
    Butler BE; Folland NA; Trainor LJ
    Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 304():1-6. PubMed ID: 23764671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.
    Neuert V; Verhey JL; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 93(5):2766-76. PubMed ID: 15846001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brief pitch-priming facilitates infants' discrimination of pitch-evoking noise: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Butler BE; Trainor LJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Dec; 83(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 24095845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():113-123. PubMed ID: 30096491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.
    Krishnan A; Gandour JT; Suresh CH
    Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 1637():102-117. PubMed ID: 26903418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.